Will the Jews of the USA and France be expelled to Israel?

While thinking about my previous paper and the expansion program of the State of Israel, I had an idea about the Jews of the United States and France.  What if the elite were planning to expel them to Israel before and during World War III?

Until then, I had told myself that this was unlikely, because I thought that the presence of everyday Jews served the Jewish/illuminati elite to control the USA and France. So I didn't think about it more than that.

But if the objective of the elite is actually to spread the white race, and Jews only serve as fanatical white settlers, then it is different. All ordinary Jews will be used for this purpose.

Moreover, when you think about it a little more, it is clear that the Greater Israel project will suddenly require a rather large population inflow. It is true that Israel's Jews have a fairly high birth rate (near 3.2 children per woman). But that may not be enough when large territories are annexed by Israel. It will therefore require a massive and rapid influx of people.

And even if the goal was not to increase the territory of the white race, but the one of the Jews, we saw for the 2nd World War that the elite had no problem deporting Jews. So, to the extent that they will most likely be necessary to populate the Greater Israel, whether the real objective of the elite is the expansion of the white race or the expansion of the Jews, it will not change anything for them. They will be moved to Israel. 

It is true that in this region, there is mostly desert. This too must have unconsciously made me think that the inflow of Jews from the USA and France was not necessary. But in fact, there are quite a lot of people in this area. It's not just desert everywhere. So, there will still be a need for many settlers to occupy the territories taken.

Especially since, as we have seen, it is likely that, in reality, the Greater Israel project is underestimated and that the entire Middle East will be targeted by this white race expansion project. So it will require a very large number of settlers.

Thus, it becomes likely that the Jews from the USA and France will be expelled in order to occupy the territories taken from the Arabs when  the Greater Israel is established. Why them in particular? Well, because of their numbers. These are the two countries with the highest number of Jews outside Israel. The Jews of the USA are in the 5.7 million, those of France probably in the 600,000 (see here). That's 6,300,000 that could be used as settlers. But in the United States, there would be 10 million Jews if you take a broader definition of Jews. So that could be 10.6 million Jews who could be mobilized to colonize the greater Israel. Of course, it is possible that Jews from other countries may also be targeted, such as those from Italy (see the map of countries that will come under Muslim control before World War III).

Does the Israel project really serve to bring back the Jewish people who would have been expelled 2000 years earlier?

The most common theory among conspiracy theorists who believe in Jewish conspiracy is that the creation of the state of Israel is the result of a conspiracy by Jewish leaders to bring the Jewish people back to the lands from which they were driven 2000 years ago. Jewish leaders would have gradually taken control of all Western countries with the aim not only of being masters of the world, but also of recreating Israel. Once this is done, an additional objective would be to make Israel the world's capital. Moreover, Freemasonry is said to be a creation of Jewish leaders. It would be an intermediate power created to have the elite of the goys applying the orders of Jewish leaders.

That's what I thought until a few years ago.

On the surface, it seems to make sense as an idea. Indeed, there appears to have been a takeover of the various European countries by Jewish leaders over the past 500 years. The first country would have been Italy with the Medici, then England with Cromwell, then probably the USA during the colonization, then France with the 1789 revolution, then most European countries with the takeover of Europe by the French under Napoleon, and finally Russia in 1917.  And for Freemasons, some say that Freemasons' rites are Jewish from A to Z.

As for the desire to recreate the state of Israel, it seems logical, since, according to their sacred books, it is the land promised by God and they actually lived there for several centuries before being driven out. And since Jews have remained very religious for centuries, it is normal that they wanted to return to the land that God had promised them. However, before the end of the 19th century, we don't have much evidence that they were making a plan to get back there. But from then on, things became clear (writings by Nathan Birnbaum from 1882, book by Theodore Herzl "The State of the Jews" in 1896, Balfour declaration in 1917, San Remo conference in 1920, etc...). Moreover, we can think that the desire to take power in Europe, then in the world, is a strong indication of this desire to return to Israel, beyond the mere desire for domination.

The reason why there are all those satanic signs and themes in movies, songs, events, etc…

With what I have already said on the subject, namely that the system sets up an opposition between whites and Arabs/black people in Europe at the racial level and an opposition between Satanists/normal people and democrats/despots at the level of ideas, you can understand why we have had more and more movies since the 1990s on the theme of Satanism or including more or less references to Satanism inside. The same goes for video clips, song lyrics, and various events.

 If you want to set up a Satanist/normal opposition, people who could oppose Satanism must already know that there is a hidden Satanist force. And since there was no sign of such a force until then, there was no reason for anyone to suspect it. Therefore, it was necessary to reveal its existence through the different means of communication. Hence all these films, video clips, and illuminati signs by famous people, etc....

And it must be revealed in a fairly clear way. Since until then, no one was aware of the existence of this Satanist orientation of the ruling elite, and since it is something quite incredible, just giving vague clues, things that are a little too obscure would make it almost impossible for anyone to be convinced. So the elite had to put signs and clues that will leave no doubt to conscious people that the elite is committed to Satanism. That's why we have more and more obvious signs that are shown in movies or by famous people and that's why we have artists who say squarely they have sold their souls to the devil, and things like that.

And of course, for those who would not understand the apparent evidence on their own, there are websites and videos on Youtube denouncing the satanic/illuminati plot to inform them and get things perfectly clear.

But, since the illuminatis do not want to convert everyone to anti-Satanism, it mustn't be overly disclosed. So that's why it's not displayed in such a way that even the mass of ordinary people would become aware of it either. It's still opaque enough so that only the most knowledgeable and conscious people understand.

And then there is the safeguard of anti-conspiracy discourse. Most people will not dare to believe that the elite is corrupt and Satanist, because that would be conspirationism and, in their heads, it is the speech of half-crazy guys. With this mental barrier, ordinary people will think that the signs they see in movies or shows, are just a fashion. For films specifically, they will think that it is just one theme among others, something that appeals to young people, and that's why it often comes up. Or they will see it as a sign of a degeneration of society, but will not go any further. And for the music videos, they will think that the singers introduce these themes only to shock.

In addition, many people will focus on Islamists. This will be the case for many nationalists. For them, the real threat is Muslim immigrants. So they will not focus, or not much, on all these illuminati and satanic signs. They will attribute moral and sexual decadence to leftism without going any further. And the leaders of the nationalist camp, who are all agents of influence in the service of the elite, will do everything to divert those people from the idea of a Satanist conspiracy and instead make them focus on the problem of the Islamists. And they are already doing that by saying that the decadence of the mores comes from leftists, the legacy of the sexual revolution of the sixties, feminism, the questioning of authority in all its forms, the child king, the homosexual lobby, corrupt elites, the media that want to make easy money, moral relativism, possibly atheism, etc...

Thanks to this strategy, Jewish/illuminated leaders will succeed in convincing part of the population that there is an attempt by our elites to establish a Satanic world, while the majority of the population will continue to believe that there is nothing of this kind and that all these are the deliriums of conspirationists.

Anyway, if there are all these satanic/illuminati elements in all current cultural production, it is because it is done on purpose so that people can learn about it.

On the side of the anti-illuminati conspiracy camp, the explanation for the presence of all these "evidences" of the Satanist plot is that the Satanists are now so sure of their power that they are no longer afraid to reveal themselves in the open.

That's what I thought at first, when I discovered all this. But once you realize the scam of the 3rd World War plan, it becomes clear that this is not the real reason.

Moreover, the way things have been going in the last few centuries does not go in that direction. Jewish/illuminated leaders were already all-powerful 3 centuries ago. So there was nothing stopping them from doing that before. If they are really Satan worshipers and wanted to convert the population to Satanism from the beginning, they should have indoctrinated it in this way a long time ago, for at least 2 or 3 centuries.

But that's not what we can see. There have been advances and setbacks in the liberation of the mores over the past 300 years. We had the century of Enlightenment very liberal and very anticlerical. Then, the 19th century was much more rigorous. The end of the 19th century was quite anticlerical in France. But it was one of the only countries to have this policy. Why do you do that, if the goal was to have increasingly perverted populations? Why not take advantage of the advances of the 18th century to go even further in the 19th century? Why not establish anticlericalism in other European countries at the end of the 19th century? Thus, they could have achieved their goal 100 years ago.

Then there was the interwar period (1918-1939), when mores were somewhat dissolute. But this was only true in the big cities of some countries (the "Roaring Twenties" in France, the "Golden Twenties" in England, the "Goldene Zwanziger" in Germany or the "Roaring Twenties" in the USA). And in the United States, it was still the era of prohibition (1919-1933). It makes no sense to impose prohibition in a country as big and influential as the United States if the goal is to pervert the world. Then, in all Western countries, it became (or remained, depending on the country) quite serious again in the years going from 45 to 65, despite the arrival of rock music. In the USSR, life was totally sinister. So, here again, it slowed down the establishment of global perversion and Satanist society. It is only since about 68 that mores have really degenerated (and only since the 1990s in the countries of the former USSR). Satan's worshippers apparently do not seem in much of a hurry to establish the reign of their god.

So, all these advances and setbacks concerning mores go in the direction of the idea that the real goal was not to establish a Satanist society, but to manipulate one of the two camps for the objective of the 3rd World War. And once it is over, the elite will drop this story of Satanist society, just as they dropped communism once it has no longer been useful. Who still believes that the whole earth will one day be under communist control? No one. It's now a thing of the past, a dinosaur thing. So much so that the younger generations barely know what it is all about. Well, it will be the same for Satanism once it is no longer useful for the elite.

The ban on foreigners to buy real estate in New Zealand, and the closing of the frontiers of several South American countries, the beginning of a general trend?

I saw a news story a few days ago saying that foreigners could no longer buy real estate in New Zealand.

We can think that this is just the beginning of the movement. Indeed, when the war in Europe and eventually in America begins to become a little too obvious, many people will be tempted to flee to foreign countries that will be far from the future conflict: countries like New Zealand, Australia, South America, China, etc....

Of course, the Jewish/illuminatis leaders have anticipated that. So long before people start to understand what is happening, they will close the borders of these countries and prohibit foreigners from owning real estate there. So Europeans and Americans will be forced to stay in their countries and wage or suffer war.

In short, they will close the trap as they did in 1939 for Jews (see my blog on the Second World War).

Nationalist parties, why a rise in power as early as the 80s?

Many European nationalist parties were launched in the late 1990s or even the early 2000s. And their rise in power has been essentially from the 2000s. This is the case in Finland with the Finns Party (from 1999), in Greece (Golden Dawn, Popular Orthodox Rally), in Hungary (Jobbik), in Norway (Progress Party), in the Netherlands (Party for Freedom), in Sweden (Sweden Democrats), etc.... So, it corresponds roughly to the agenda described in the previous article (necessity to have nationalist parties in the late 90s and early 2000s, especially on the Internet, to counter anti-illuminatis).

But there are two nationalist parties which have become important in European countries since the 1980s, this is the case of the National Front (NF) in France and the FPO in Austria (with a score of 9.7% since 1986).

It is true that there was also the Italian Social Movement. But it was stagnating at around 5% or 6%, and those scores were down from the 1970s. Similarly, there was the Vlaams Block in Belgium, which had already existed since 1978. But, at first, it was more of a separatist party than an anti-immigrant party. And he scored fairly low until the 1988 Antwerp elections when he scored 17.7%. But it was only in one town. And it didn't result in such high scores in the general election. So, in the 1980s, the only two real nationalist parties, with significant and increasing scores were the FN and the FPO.

That said, the FPO was a little behind the National Front, because it was more a populist party than a far-right party as heretical as the National Front. So his positioning was less extreme. Moreover, even if it belonged to an ideologically emblematic country (Austria, the homeland from which Hitler came), it was of much less geopolitical importance. So it had an impact, but clearly less than that of the NF.

So, in reality, it was mainly the National Front that, in the 1980s, was the great far-right party in Europe.

Once again, one can wonder why the masters of the world made these parties become important so early, when they could have made them emerge towards the end of the 90s, like the others.

In my opinion, there are several reasons.

First, it was used as a deterrent. It was important to continue to impose immigration hysterically, making it a moral problem, almost religious, therefore, a choice that is not debatable. Since Jean-Marie le Pen, the leader of the National Front, was presented as Hitler's spiritual son, who was considered then almost as the devil, to fight against the Pen was to fight against the devil, against the threat of a society with values totally contrary to those in place then, a little hell on earth, therefore clearly a religious type of fight. Moreover, French nationalists regularly complained about the "reductio ad Hitlerum", of the demonization to which they were subjected.

And it ensured that people didn't think clearly. If the debate had been dispassionate, people would have been able to say to themselves that it was not normal to bring so many immigrants without training, without money and without speaking the language, which meant that most were unemployable and this, in countries already suffering mass unemployment. But now, with the NF's rejection, people were only thinking with their guts, with their emotions. And as a result, the masters of the world could impose this immigration in European countries easily.

Nationalist movements. Why and why now?

As we have seen, during the 3rd World War between Arab and black Muslims and white Europeans, the latter will be divided into two camps: the anti-illuminatis (allied to Muslims) and the anti-Muslims (themselves divided into moderate democrats and nationalists).

Thus, the rise of nationalist movements has resulted relatively little from the political, economic and social events of the last 40 years. It's something clearly built by Jewish leaders. And of course, all nationalist leaders are Jewish or Freemasons.

If Jewish leaders had wanted there to be no nationalist movements, there would have been nothing or virtually nothing. We would have continued to celebrate the African immigrant as the new superman. We would have continued to say that crossbreeding was inevitable and enviable, and that immigration was economically necessary. And anyone criticizing that would have been blacklisted. The elite would also have put in place a few agents of influence to play the villains who are stigmatized, so that everyone is terrorized at the thought of suffering the same fate. And nobody would have said anything, not even in the private circle.

Even if they hadn't had a particular will on this, most likely nothing would have happened, because the ability of ordinary people to ally themselves is extremely weak.

So, the development of nationalist movements is something that is wanted, put in place, organized by Jewish leaders. This is all under their complete control.

 

The reason that leads them to do this is that since there will be a rise in power of Muslims, it seems normal that there will be a rise in power of nationalist movements. The second is logically the counterpart of the first.

That said, we can think that the illuminatis could have made traditional parties assume the role of nationalists. After all, they could have made them gradually change their minds regarding Muslims and become increasingly hostile to them to the point where war would seem inevitable. Then there would have been no need for nationalist movements.

But, first, it would have seemed odd if extremist movements had not developed at that time. There is an extreme left wing for economic and social issues. It would have seemed suspicious that the far right is not growing in power thanks to the question of immigration. So it was natural to make them gain followers with the arrival of mass immigration.

And second, for the Jewish leaders' plan, there must be fanatics on both sides. It helps explain a future war with the rise of extremism; whereas with moderate democrats on the white side, it lacks fanaticism and hysteria.

These two elements are not totally indispensable. But it makes the story more credible. So it is interesting for the illuminatis to have powerful nationalist movements.

But one can wonder why the illuminatis set up the nationalist movements now. Why don't they increase their power, say 10 or 20 years before the war (around 2035 or 2025)?

After all, it can then be said that because of the abuses of Muslims, democratic parties have changed their minds about them, have hardened and now want to fight them. Since Muslims will then clearly represent a danger to democracy and the Western way of life, it will seem normal for the democratic parties to become hostile to them. And before that, the illuminati can justify the fact that if they continued to bring them in Europe until 2030 or 2040, it is because they were blinded by anti-racism because of the Second World War. In fact, that is what is happening in England. The Brexit is supposed to have been voted in part because of a rejection of immigration, but all this with the classical democratic parties. So, in England, there was no need for nationalist movements to have an already slightly more restrictive policy towards immigrants. And so, we don't see why there would be a need for it in the future.

Well, already, we have the two reasons already mentioned. But there is a third one, which makes the thing indispensable.

As we have seen, during the war, there will be two opposing camps: the anti-Muslim camp and the pro-Muslim camp. And these two camps will consist of two sub-groups:

• the nationalists and the perverted democrats on one side
• the Muslims and the anti-illuminatis conspirationists on the other one.

In these two subgroups, we are interested in nationalists and anti-illuminatis conspirationists.

Here, there is a problem at the level of anti-illuminati conspirationism for the masters of the world. Without another movement facing it, it would be the only conspirationist movement, especially on the Internet.

Of course, at the level of normal people (blue pill), there is all the anti-conspiracy propaganda that allows to control them and prevent them from going to this side. At that level, there is no problem.

But all potential dissidents would risk joining this one movement. In other words, a good number of people of this kind who might otherwise be seduced by nationalism could adhere to anti-illuminatis ideas, particularly about the fact that attacks and wars are bogus. And the illuminatis don't want that. These people must continue to believe in propaganda about the terrorist attacks and think that wars are "real" (in the sense that there are real enemies and nothing is rigged). So there has to be another movement that deals with anti-illuminatis on the Internet and eventually in real life. There must be opposition to anti-illuminatis at the dissident level. There must be some counterpart.

And of course, this counterpart is the anti-Muslim nationalist movements. By having very active nationalist movements on the Internet, we have this opposition to anti-illuminatis on the ideas that the Jewish/illuminatis leaders do not want to see adopted by the anti-Muslims, notably concerning the fact that wars are arranged, that the leaders of the various camps in fact all work for the masters of the world, that the attacks are not only false flags, but even hoaxes, that there are crisis actors, etc...

And this counterpart had to be put in place as soon as the anti-illuminatis movement was launched.

And the latter had to be launched in the early 2000s. This because it took time before the war to spread these incredible ideas and because it was necessary to launch the perversion of society early enough, therefore, it was necessary to launch the anti-illuminati side so that this one makes revelations on the perversion of society.

So, since the anti-illuminatis movement had to be started in the early 2000s, anti-Muslim movements also had to be launched at that time, especially on the Internet. It was absolutely essential.

If nationalist movements were launched around 2030 or 2040, it would be too late. Anti-illuminatis conspirationists would have occupied the ground of dissident ideas for a long time. Therefore, having an anti-Muslim camp right now is necessary to prevent a part of people from adhering to the anti-illuminatis revelations.

That is why, starting around the year 2000, we saw the emergence not only of some official nationalist movements, but also of many small groups of nationalist activists acting essentially on the Internet, as well as individuals holding nationalist blogs.

In fact, it is mainly the last two that are important here. In official nationalist movements, there are mostly ordinary people who are not so likely to believe in anti-illuminatis ideas. Of course, it is still interesting to have official movements to ensure that even at this level, there is no contamination by those ideas. Especially since the power of these organizations (in terms of number of members, and recognition by the media) gives credibility to the small groups that do activism on the Internet.

But since anti-illuminatis propaganda is mainly done on the Internet and aimed at the most rebellious people to official ideas, the most important are the small groups and nationalist individuals who engage in activism on the Internet. It is they who, through their propaganda, prevent nationalists from being seduced by anti-illuminatis ideas.

They are all the more necessary as there are countries that do not have significant nationalist parties yet in 2018. In these countries too, it must be avoided that the anti-illuminati discourse dominates. Therefore, anti-Muslim propaganda on the Internet is needed to keep nationalists away from these ideas. Concerning this battle of ideas, everything is played on the Internet in several countries.

And of course, not only will the various anti-Muslim nationalist movements put forward ideas contrary to those of the anti-illuminatis on the important points we have seen above, but they will also do so in a hysterical manner.

Indeed, the anti-illuminatis camp makes revelations that seem true. Therefore, there is a risk of contamination of anti-Muslims by anti-illuminatis ideas. The mere presence of anti-Muslims and their opposition to anti-illuminatis ideas is not enough. The nationalist camp must be fanatical, hysterical on those points, so that the people who belong to it cannot be convinced by the ideas of the other camp. They must not think calmly. And their field of consciousness must be limited to the problem of Muslims alone and some other political stuff of a lower level of consciousness and therefore not at risk for the Jewish/illuminati leaders.

This is why we have extremely aggressive and often insulting reactions on nationalist sites when a person makes a comment saying that a Muslim attack is a hoax made with crisis actors or that the Second World War was staged and that Hitler was an agent of the system (we can find this kind of reactions also on mainstream sites that let nationalists react on the comments section). This is because these ideas must remain totally taboo among nationalists.

And of course, the overwhelming majority of guys who react like that on forums and blogs are agents of influence. There must be some real excited people who have been influenced by all these years of propaganda. But 99% are paid agents of influence. The true nationalists are not numerous enough to intervene on all subjects on all forums. And they wouldn't be as hysterical, aggressive, ironic, insulting, closed, etc... There's only an army of agents of influence trained for that who can carry out this kind of mission.

And for ordinary people, these reactions from nationalists seem logical. For them, nationalists are aggressive and heinous people. So it's normal for them to react hysterically and obtusely. They will not think for a second that they are agents of influence.

PS: This is also why a number of these anti-Muslim movements are more or less pro-Israel (and completely forget that it was the Jewish leaders who brought Muslims to Europe and continue to do so). Since the aim is for Europeans to approve Israel's enlargement after the war, propaganda must begin right now within the nationalist movements.

This obviously does not mean that nationalist groups that criticize Israel are not led by agents. Jewish leaders control all trends. Same thing for blogs, those which criticize Israel are not all held by true nationalists. There must be some. But most of them are run by agents.

Why do agents of influence reveal the concepts of false flags, hoaxes and crisis actors?

We saw in the previous article that it is normal for agents of influence to reveal the plan of Jewish/illuminatis leaders. It does not bother the latter since the truths revealed are only partial.

But there is one thing that seems rather incredible, it is the revelation of the system of false flags, hoax and crisis actors. There are many sites that are obviously run by agents of influence who regularly reveal new false flags and show that all terrorist attacks are actually carried out by Jewish/illuminatis leaders, and that they are hoaxes made with crisis actors.

At first glance, that sounds extraordinary. Because it seems to go totally against the interests of the elite members, since it shows that the Muslim threat is completely bogus. This is the kind of thing that could ensure that the Third World War does not take place, since many Europeans could think that all this is false and that there is no way they fight against Muslims.

And then, there are reasons to doubt about the fact that these guys are agents. And you can be led to think that, finally, the anti-illuminatis who reveal this are real dissidents, real independent conspirators and not agents of influence.

But when you think about it, you realize that it doesn't really bother the members of the elite.

Because, who's talking about false flags? The anti-illuminatis.

And what will be the role of anti-illuminatis during the 3rd World War? Well, in part to serve as allies for Muslims against anti-Muslims.

From then on, will revealing the false flag principle cause them to be against Muslims during the war? No. On the contrary, since they will know that Muslims are innocent of the crimes attributed to them, they will be all the more ready to ally themselves with them against the "hordes of Satan".

Moreover, it has the important advantage of greatly strengthening the credibility of the agents of influence. With such advanced revelations, people can only think that those who reveal them are real conspirationists and not agents working for the elite.

So, we have this extraordinary situation where agents of influence can speak freely about false flags without it hindering the Jewish/illuminatis leaders' plan for the 3rd World War. However, there is a limit, which is that these revelations can only be made in the anti-illuminatis milieu. Elsewhere, it would become problematic. But still, Jewish/illuminatis leaders can offer themselves the luxury of unveiling some of their most advanced manipulations without them hindering their final plan.

 

That said, in practice, anti-illuminatis agents of influence speak of false flags, but without saying what the purpose is for the illuminatis. The thing is almost never put into perspective in relation to more global objectives. It is part of the recurrent theme among anti-illuminatis that all the information we are given is false, but it does not go any further. As a result, the revelation loses much of its impact. Apparently, even if revealing that it is used to invent a false Muslim enemy is manageable as we have just seen, the elite must still feel that it could be a problem. Perhaps at the present time, these truths could influence some people in the anti-Muslim camp, which would be counterproductive. Thus, agents of influence generally say little or nothing about the root causes of these false flags.

However, people who discover this information about false flags could reason on their own and understand their real cause. But, as we have seen, the agents of the anti-illuminati camp generally do not talk about the war to come against the Muslims (or in a few lines). They focus essentially on the arrival of a Satanist society, the antichrist and other demons. So, the overwhelming majority of people who read this information about false flags will not make the connection between them and a possible 3rd World War against Muslims. In order for these people to establish the link by themselves (since anti-illuminatis agents do not), the anti-illuminatis should also regularly speak of a possible war against Muslims. But they don't.

So, in theory, Jewish/illuminatis leaders could reveal the reasons for false flags. But in practice, it could be quite risky and since they don't like the risk, they don't do it (at least for the moment). But, they can reveal the existence of the false flag system itself without it being problematic for them. As long as the real causes of these are not given, everything is fine.

 

Where it would really be surprising is if some nationalists also revealed the principle of false flags, hoaxes and crisis actors. By this I mean the fact that the overwhelming majority of attacks are actually bogus. Now, that would really go against the interests of the illuminatis. Because there, many anti-Muslims could say to themselves that since the attacks are bogus, Muslims are not the bloodthirsty fools of Allah whom they are told and that there is no way they will fight against them.

But, on the anti-Muslim side, nobody reveals the principle of false flags, with the exception of a few rather particular ones. On the contrary, as soon as an anti-illuminati comes to speak of false flag regarding a terrorist attack, most nationalists (mainly agents of influence) criticize him hysterically. On the anti-Muslim side, the false flag principle is almost totally taboo.

It shows that the nationalist side is completely under control, because most false flags are obvious. So if they were honest, some nationalists should talk about it (I mean people who have a blog or a website). But no, nobody does. Nobody does it because nearly all of them are agents.

In fact, there are some false flags that are revealed in the nationalist milieu. But it's essentially when it affects Russian interests. Here, all of a sudden, it is acceptable in this political milieu to talk about false flags (generally presented as made by Americans of course). As it remains within the framework of the influence game between states, and as it concerns only a rather small number of events, it does not lead to any major questioning. Nationalists will not extend the concept to all attacks (whereas this is the case among anti-illuminatis; for them, all attacks are false flags). So that's not a problem for the elite.

And they hardly ever talk about hoax. For them, even for the very rare times they speak of false flags, they almost always admit that something really happened and that the people involved in the affair are real people, but manipulated by this or that power. As a result, the concept of crisis actors is also unknown to them.

So, we are very far from the impact of the anti-illuminatis revelations concerning this subject.

And one can think that if there are these few revelations concerning false flags on the nationalist side, it is probably partly to counter the concept that is proposed on the anti-illuminati side. This allows saying that on the nationalist side, people are not closed to the concept of state manipulation regarding terrorist attacks.