Race Mixing as a Racist Pro-White Project

With the plan of mass immigration and promotion of race mixing currently being imposed by the elite in the West, there is a very significant increase in the number of black/white and Arab/white mixed-race people in Europe and black/white and Latino/white in America.

One wonders what will happen to all these mestizos after the 3rd World War. Will the elite simply exterminate them? At first glance, I don't think so. Maybe some of them will disappear during the war. But most of them should survive.

In my opinion, the elite will expel them to Africa. They'll use this to partially whitewash this continent. Then they'll be able to bring in more and more white people.

So, in fact, the current race-mixing trend serves the elite's racist pro-white agenda.

The people who are currently mixing are convinced that by doing so, they're using the ultimate weapon against racism. But in reality, the exact opposite is happening. Instead, they are serving white supremacism. What an irony.

Thus, it strongly suggests that the next part of the world to undergo the racist project of the elite will be Africa. It makes sense to me. Once they've whitewashed North America and the Middle East, the elite obviously won't stop there. And the next few targets are not many. It's either Asia, India, Africa or South America. And since Africa is closer and poses a greater threat to the integrity of the white race than Asia and South America, it is likely that it will be the focus of the next elite whitening plan.

Perhaps it will be Africa and South America. Indeed, one wonders what will become of the mixed-race Latinos in America. But, as Africa is a big chunk, the elite will probably focus mainly on that continent. In that case, perhaps some of the Latinos in question will go to South America and some to Africa. We shall see.

All this will take time, probably 200 years or more. So, in addition to predicting what will happen in the next 70 years, we can foresee approximately what will happen in the next 200 or 300 years. If my analysis is correct, of course.

PS:

And the Africans will not be able to refuse these immigrants, since they will be partly racial brothers, who are moreover attached to African culture. So how to say no to their coming? And in any case, Africans will have no choice. Here as elsewhere, it is the elite who decide and the people who obey.

We can think that some of the whites who will have allied themselves with the blacks and Arabs in Europe will also be expelled to Africa. As a result, they will help to whiten this continent a little more. The elite will probably make sure that a substantial part of them will not assimilate, which will allow the first white colonies to be established there. So these people, who will be among the most anti-racist, will be forced to serve a totally racist project. Furthermore, the elite will manage to make their children become more and more racist over the generations so that they will approve of the white colonization project.

That's what happened in Israel. Those who arrived in the 1930s and 1940s were mostly anti-racist and anti-xenophobic. And now, a lot of their grandchildren are xenophobes, or even uninhibited racists. A number of these elders must be disgusted with what has become of their people. And some of them are letting it be known. But they're out of touch. They are people of the past. As their xenophobic or racist grandchildren will become when they are no longer needed by the elite.

It's the same with the communists. They saw themselves as the future of the world in the post-wwII years, then they became totally old-fashioned and their ideas rejected by their children once the elite no longer needed communism. Among the people of this generation, the most adaptable/opportunistic evolved, people of conviction and psychorigids continued to believe in it and became relics of the past.

PS2:

It is possible that the elite use Asian immigration to Africa to justify European intervention. They will make Asians act obnoxious against Africans. As a result, Africans will be more than happy to welcome white people back. In addition, if African countries accept mass Asian immigration, they will find it difficult to justify refusing mass European immigration. But well, this is a prediction based on the growing influence of the Chinese in Africa that is currently underway. But over the next 200 years, that could very well change and this hypothesis could become obsolete.

PS3:

And regarding the colonization of Africa by white people after WWIII, the birth rate won't be a problem. At that point, the elite will ensure that the white one increase sharply, while the black one collapse. As a result, the migration balance will turn in favor of whites in Africa and eventually South America. But this time, there will be no turning back. At the end of the process, there will be no blacks at all and very few Latinos.

Historical revisionism was a creation of the elite

I became interested in revisionism in the late 1980s. And especially from 1990, when the Fabius-Gayssot law, which banned revisionist opinions, was passed in France. Of course, from that date on, I was convinced that the revisionists were right. If a government bans an opinion so hysterically, it is most certainly true. But finding books on the subject was almost impossible because of the ban. As a result, I was only able to discover revisionist writings in 1996, through the Internet, by going to the famous Aaargh site. And from the very first articles, I received confirmation that the Holocaust was a pure invention.

Of course, this very quickly led me to become interested in the career of the most famous revisionists, including Faurisson. From the outset, two or three things made me slightly twitch. At the time, not being in the extreme conspiracy, I let pass this strange information. But as I became more and more conspirationist, and thinking back on this information a few years ago, I had more and more doubts. Especially since I had discovered in the early 2000s that many of the new stars of revisionism were in fact agents.

Over the last 3 or 4 years, I began to think that the first dissident movements had probably been set up by the authorities to launch conspirationnism among the masses. There, I began to think that revisionism was one of these movements.

But since I did not see too much use for revisionism for the masters of the world outside of that, since I was thinking about other things and since Faurisson was still a monument in my mind, I had left it at that; even if my doubts were becoming more and more important.

But, since I understood, a few months ago, that the Israel project must be a racist pro-white project and that a large part of the Jews of the diaspora will most likely be deported to Israel before and during World War III, there, the role of revisionism, in addition to participating in the rise of the conspirationnist movement, became very clear to me. Its primary goal was to raise "anti-Semitism" in order to send Jews from the diaspora to Israel. It confirmed that revisionism was indeed a project of the elite.

This was very difficult to understand for a very long time as also because, until about 10 years ago, the revisionist movement remained a niche trend, something known only to a few ultra-conspirationnists. So it was hard to think that it could be of any use to the elite in any way. It's only in the last few years that we feel that revisionism is starting to come out of its ghetto and that we can glimpse its role.

And of course, the Fabius-Gayssot law in France was created on purpose to advertise revisionism. It was not made to bury it, but to spread it. A law that prohibits a historical research movement is a clear signal that this movement is right and that the government is trying to hide the truth. Once again, for 30 years, the true purpose of this law did not emerge, because revisionism has remained a small group. Thus, the situation was consistent with the apparent purpose of this law, namely, to destroy revisionism. But it's getting clear, now that revisionism is becoming more widespread, that the aim was actually to propagate it. It just took 20 years for it to become clear. The operation was meant to act with delay. So the real goal was unsuspected.

And the development of revisionism will increase anti-Semitism. Revisionists have been viciously persecuted for decades. Most Western countries have enacted anti-revisionist laws and others to combat anti-Semitism. Obviously, in the minds of people who have understood the scam of the holocaust will grow the idea that the Jews control the world and that they are truly ruthless and obnoxious tyrants. And it's not just revisionism that's used for that. There are also many revelations made elsewhere about Jewish power. Many Jewish-critical leaders have also been martyred. Jews are more and more associated with Satanism, the migration invasion, etc... In short, the evidence on the existence of occult Jewish power and on its odious and destructive character is accumulating, all provided by the elite in reality. On this basis, the elite will be able to justify the coming to power of anti-Jewish political movements (an alliance of Muslims, leftists and conspirationists), and then the expulsion of some or all European Jews to Israel (and even American ones). This will ensure that there will be enough people to colonize the greater Israel that will be created around World War III. And after the greater Israel, will come the colonization of the whole Middle East by the whites.

 

That's why the extermination evidence is ridiculous on every level. It's because the elite wanted some people to understand that it was a scam.

If the elite had wanted the Holocaust to look real, they would have had no problem making it look like that. As Hitler was an agent of the elite, he would then have ordered his secret service to produce thousands of false documents to prove that an extermination project was being carried out. The German authorities could have put thousands of bodies of German and Russian soldiers killed in combat in pits near concentration camps; and even civilians dead in hospitals and without families. They could have made private videos of Hitler declaring his extermination intentions to his trusted ministers. All this would have been "discovered" by totally "independent" observers. And then no one could have doubted the reality of the Holocaust. If the elite did not do this, it was because they wanted people to realize the deception as soon as they looked closely at the evidence of the Holocaust. They wanted the lie of the Shoah to be exposed and that many people end up no longer believing it.

It's like the Islamist attacks right now, they have to be staged and the deception often has to be completely grotesque for many people to understand that it is all false and to switch to the conspirationist side.

 In fact, even assuming that Hitler was not an agent of the elite, it would have been possible for the victors to create false documents, to have apparently reliable, credible and neutral witnesses, and thus to produce seemingly irrefutable evidence. If they did not do so, it is because they wanted us to find out that this holocaust story is bogus. And, of course, since it wasn't ordinary people who were going to dare to ask these questions, they put agents to do the job. In any case, the elite obviously would not have wanted ordinary people to question the lie. It could have been dangerous, because they could have asked themselves embarrassing questions (as I do now). So it had to be agents who did the job.

As the document is very long, i put it here in PDF format. And since the translation will take some times, I put it here first in french. The english version will follow.

Robert Faurisson, très probablement un agent V.2

 

October 21, 2020. Finally, I have translated the text in English:

 

Robert Faurisson, most probably an agent

During the translation, I have heavily modified two subparts of the document (thus de second version of the french text). The one about the attacks of Faurisson (subpart 1.10.3 "Details and thoughts about the attacks"), and the one in appendix 8 (A. 8.6: The problem of developing revisionism 2.0 in the USA in the 45-70s).