Recolonization of Africa: The Role of North and South America

 

Reading this article, I thought of the following.

In my opinion, the project of colonizing Africa is a three-stage project:

• An initial temporary colonization was intended to lay the foundations for political control of Africa. Human resources were then too scarce to allow for settlement colonization. Once that was done, the colonizers had to leave. But, of course, Africa remained under control through its leaders (albeit covertly).
• The second stage will be to bring in whites and mixed-race people following World War III and possibly following other conflicts, to effect an initial whitening of Africa.
• Once the rot has set in, the third stage will be the total or near-total whitening of Africa.

 

The Contribution of Anglo-Saxon Countries in the Recolonization of Africa

 

So, if the English colonized part of Africa, it wasn't just to use the economic resources of these countries at that time. It's also for the project of recolonizing Africa (this is also the case for France). The Anglo-Saxon world will provide Black people, especially mixed-race people, and a certain number of white people for the second stage of colonization.

It's true that there aren't many Black people and mixed-race people in England. But there are many in the USA.

So, after the Third World War, Black people and mixed-race people from the USA will be deported or banished to Africa (and a small portion of white people who will have been in the same camp). And the countries that will receive them will probably be the countries formerly colonized by England. This will allow Anglo-Saxon countries to participate in the recolonization of Africa alongside France.

So, one might think that since English colonization is now old, the countries in question abandoned the use of the English language a long time ago. And therefore, there's no reason for banished Black people to go to those countries. But in fact, many of the countries in question still speak English.

"List of African countries that speak English: Includes official, co-official, and bilingual English-speaking countries such as Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, South Africa, Malawi, Rwanda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Cameroon."

So yes, Black people in the US will have reasons to go to these countries.

There are about 10% of blacks in the USA, that's 30 million. In fact, they are practically all mixed race. So, that's more like 30 million mixed race people. We can easily add 40 or 50 million more diluted mixed race people. So, that's 70 or 80 million mixed race black people to send to the former African colonies.

 

The Contribution of South America

 

Moreover, we can assume that some South American countries will subsequently be called upon to contribute. If there are so many Black people in Brazil, it wasn't done for nothing, but for this very purpose. And that's a huge population. There are 211 million inhabitants in Brazil. 10% are Black, 45% are mixed race, and 45% are white. So, officially, we have 55% Black and mixed race, or 110 million. But apparently, most white people are more or less mixed race. So, the population of true whites must be very low, more like 10 %, which means we actually have about 180 million Black and mixed race people. And Brazil's population will continue to grow. So, that will be a huge number of people to colonize Africa. Since many will speak English, many will go to the former English colonies. And some will go to the former French colonies.

And since they are quite white, that will mean a lot of mixed race people.

To justify the policies of expelling Black and mixed-race people, one might assume that there will be conflicts between Brazil and neighboring countries, especially those in the south, such as Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay. But perhaps also Venezuela in the north. Indeed, the elite will create conflicts between Black and mixed-race people to gain the latter's support. And one might assume that the United States will intervene against Brazil. Brazil's enemy countries will then have racist leaders, and when they win the war, Black and mixed-race people from Brazil will be expelled to Africa. Or at least, the elite will create the conditions so that they are almost forced to go to Africa.

A priori, Brazil should be the main country concerned. There are Black and mixed-race people also in Venezuela and Colombia, a few at the equator. But significantly fewer than in Brazil. And there are very few elsewhere. This is what we can see on Wikipedia. "There are almost 27 million Black people in South America, and here too, Brazil leads the way with 20 million. Then come Venezuela (3 million), Colombia (2 million), and Ecuador (1 million). Finally, there are 100,000 in Guyana and 44,000 in Suriname; they are rare in other countries."

 

Timing and other reflections

 

All this will happen after World War III. First, there will be the expulsion of Black and mixed-race people from the USA (and Canada). Then, there will be the expulsion of Black and mixed-race people from South America. It's reasonable to assume that since the Middle East project will take time to be realized, this stage involving South America will only happen in 200 or 300 years.

And so we will have the same situation of crossbreeding as Brazil, but this time in Africa. Except it won't stop there. It will end with the total whitening of Africa. But that might take 500 or a thousand years.

Massive immigration, accompanied by the change in the racial composition of Africa, will make it possible to justify wars between African countries (simple ethnic differences already allow this, for example: the Hutu and the Tutsi). And also civil wars, political movements, etc. This will increase the confusion, which will mean that no one will think to accuse the elite. Especially since the elite will probably also use Asians in some places, Arabs in others, which will make it harder to accuse whites.

One might think that the elite will raise the standard of living in certain African countries, to give mixed-race and Black foreigners a reason to live there. Of course, these countries will let Black and mixed-race people come without any problem. And mixed-race people will be respected in these countries because they will boost the economy.

The elite will probably ensure that Africa's birth rate is low at that time and that there will be a baby boom. So, the newcomers will replace the native populations all the more quickly.

It may not be all African countries that will be welcoming. It will probably be three or four. But it will provide a gateway. If all African countries opened their doors wide, things would get suspicious. But with only a few countries, it will be significantly less so.

And there will thus be a significant concentration of mixed-race people in certain countries, instead of them being dispersed throughout Africa. This will allow them to then spill over into neighboring countries.
 

The possible arrival of the Jewish messiah (the mashiah)

Reading this article on the revival of the Catholic religion in France, and listening to Alain Soral speak about the necessity of the coming of the Messiah for the Jews, I thought the following:

It's possible that the elite will make the Jewish messiah arrive after World War III. I think the elite's goal through this is to ensure that white goyim and Jews are united in the future, even on a religious level, and not just politically.

Indeed, during and after World War III, white goyim and Jews will be politically united against Muslims. But there will always be the problem of religion. This could limit the possibilities of white goyim emigration to Israel. But, with a Jewish messiah who would reconcile the religious positions of the two communities, Christians and Jews would now speak with one voice. Especially since one might think that the Jewish messiah will not be represented as a purely Jewish messiah, but also as the messiah of the world. With Christians and Jews now united religiously, not only could Christian goyim come en masse to Israel, but Jews would also easily mix with them. And ultimately, the Middle East would be colonized by whites.

Thus, the arrival of the Messiah would not mean the domination of the Jews over the world, but the opposite: the loss of their political importance, their dissolution into the rest of the white world. But, for a time, it would seem to the Jews that they dominate the world. So that will help to make this change happen.

One possibility is that all Christians would be united with the Jews. In this case, the emigration of Christians to Israel would be justified by an economic boom in Israel that would push a significant number of Christians to settle there. And they would obviously be welcomed with open arms by the Israeli government. There could be other reasons for the arrival of Christians in Israel that I have not yet seen; they remain to be studied.

A second possibility is that the elite will create a schism among Christians in the future. There would be those who are close to the Jews and those who remain distant from them. This would justify a mass expulsion from Europe and the USA of those closest to the "reformed" Jews (those post-mashiah) as heretics. As we've already seen, expelling heretics is always a good way to get settlers on lands to colonize.

Then, of course, there's the problem that people are much less religious now. If there were only atheist goyim, this plan wouldn't work. But, as we saw in the last article, the elite clearly seems to be pushing for a revival of the Christian religion. Therefore, there will be many more practicing Christians in the future.

One might wonder how the elite will manage to impose the idea that such and such an individual is indeed the Jewish messiah (and even the messiah of the world). But the general intellectual level is very low. And the elite is making sure it's even lower among Jews by fanaticizing them as much as possible. And that will also be the case for Christians at that point. So, all it will take is to throw out some slightly mystical nonsense, condition people with the media, create enthusiasm-in short, the usual propaganda-and it will pass very easily with the general public. Perhaps the elite will grace us with a few high-budget productions to make people believe in miracles from the messiah in question. We'll see.

It will pass all the more easily since the elite will have previously pushed the idea of the antichrist. In fact, they're already doing so. So, after all the destruction of World War III, the economic and social chaos, the completely disordered morals, the open display of Satanism, and the arrival of a person who will be presented by his detractors as the Antichrist (and by everyone afterward), the presence of the so-called messiah will not only appear as a gift from heaven, but will also seem credible. It will appear as a gift from heaven because he will obviously put everything back in place and make the economy prosper. So, even skeptics will accept him as a great man.

Of course, this is only a possibility. Perhaps the elite will not use this solution. But, if it happens, and I'm not mistaken, and this document still exists at that time, thinking people will know what to make of this event. They won't be fooled by all the surrounding hysteria.

Why is Saudi Arabia building and developing numerous villages and small towns in the desert? For the Greater Israel project

 

version française en pdf (ici)

 

When we look at maps of Saudi Arabia, we see that there are many villages and small towns in desert or semi-desert areas. This can be seen on this map showing the western part of the country:

 

 

And if we continue eastward, we have this:

 

Moreover, for many years now, Saudi Arabia has been heavily developing its major cities.

You might wonder why Saudi Arabia is multiplying its residential areas. Given that the population is down to 2.39 children per woman by 2022, a figure that is constantly falling, and that Saudi Arabia has no recourse to immigration, it doesn't make much sense.

The answer is that it's all part of the Greater Israel project. Israel is going to invade Saudi Arabia and colonize it. It will settle settlers all over the country (initially Jewish settlers; but in the long term, the real aim is to settle non-Jewish whites). As a result, the elite is having the necessary infrastructure built by Saudi Arabia.

In other words, Saudi Arabia builds the infrastructure that will serve its future invaders. And the Saudi government does this knowingly, of course, since it is controlled by the elite.

Here is the Greater Israel project:

 

Here, only the north of Saudi Arabia is concerned. But we can be sure that, in time, the whole country will be invaded.

And if Saudi Arabia is building numerous tourist infrastructures, it's for the same reason. The settlers have to be able to enjoy themselves. They have to have a good life. And so, the elite are building leisure zones all over the place.

And the official explanation for this is that the Saudi government realizes it can't rely on oil forever. So it's looking to diversify into tourism.

By the way, the Western media don't talk about the construction of towns and villages. They prefer to keep a low profile on the subject. On the other hand, they do talk about tourist infrastructures and major projects for big cities (skyscrapers, for example), because that's quite visible. And tourists go there. So they can't avoid the subject. And in any case, there's nothing strange or suspicious about it. So it's not a problem to talk about it.

 

That being said, it's possible that before being used by Jewish settlers, then white settlers, these settlements will initially be used to accommodate war refugees from other countries: Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese, etc... Or even Saudis. Since the north will be invaded one day, refugees will have to be accommodated in the south.

 

These considerations lead us to think of another reason for the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East in general. The first is that it helps explain the wars and Western intervention in the region. Oil is a strategic resource. So it's only natural that countries should fight over it. Secondly, it explains the development of urban planning and tourist infrastructures. The Saudis have the money to do this, thanks to oil. And because of the fear of the end of oil, they have the motivation to develop tourism.

And all this thinking is also partly valid for Egypt, and probably Iraq, and other countries in the region, although the analysis must of course be adapted to these different countries.

 

Towards a revival of the Christian religion in the Western world after World War 3?

(Version française)

 

It's possible that the elite will impose a return to a religious society after the third world war. There are pros and cons at this stage. Here's what we can think of as things stand.

The need for a high birth rate after World War 3

 

Firstly, the elite will need a huge number of people to colonize the Middle East and Central America (indeed, on the American side, this is the next objective). What's more, with all the non-whites expelled from Europe and the USA, it will be necessary to repopulate. And for both these objectives, a high birth rate will be needed.

So, it's possible that the elite will impose a semi-Christian theocracy in the West, since the Christian religion encourages people to have children. I say semi-theocracy, because the church may not be in power. But it will have a very strong influence on political and social life.

But the return of religion is not a prerequisite for achieving this goal. In fact, a high birth rate could be achieved by nationalist governments, without the help of religion, via pro-natalist policies.

 

Whether the increase in the birth rate is achieved by a nationalist government or by the rise of religion, it is certain that most Western governments will abolish the right to abortion, as well as the pill. And in the case of France, enshrining this right in the constitution won't change a thing. It'll be abolished anyway.

Similarly, feminism will be totally wiped out. Women will lose most of their rights, including perhaps the right to vote (or at least the latter will be severely restricted).

The rise of masculinist movements is a sign of this. There's nothing spontaneous about them. They are clearly under the control of the elite. Otherwise, all the masculinist videos like MGTOW on Youtube would be deleted immediately. Of course, a number of such videos and channels were suppressed at first, to give the impression of a completely underground movement being hunted down by the official kommandantur. But it's over now. The fact that right from the start, the videos in question received a lot of comments, and practically all of them positive, shows that this is a movement launched by the elite. Otherwise, there would have been only a few comments, of which a third would have been negative, a third neutral/in-between and a third positive. Besides, Jordan Peterson wouldn't be on American television.

 

It also means that all the current ridiculous propaganda about ecology and Gaia dying because there are too many bad human beings will be swept away. Promoting a very high birth rate will run counter to current ecological Malthusianism. So, current ecology won't survive World War III. We'll be rid of this stupid propaganda (e.g. CO2 responsible for global warming). But we'll gain others, just as dumb.

 

The rise of Satanism

 

Another thing in favor of a return of the Christian religion is the fact that the elite are currently actively promoting Satanism.

One reason for this is that the elite want to have two very opposed blocs in the Third World War. By setting up, on the one hand, a bloc made up of nationalists, democrats and partly Satanists (whether officially or unofficially); and on the other hand, a bloc made up of Muslims and conspirationists, the elite will get these two enemy camps. Having Satanists will be enough in itself to motivate Muslims to go to war. And their delusional social project will be enough to make the conspirationists join them.

In this context, fostering Satanism may serve a second purpose for the elite: to help impose the return of the Christian religion in the future. This is the dynamic strategy of the elite. One movement serves to create another through an action-reaction mechanism. By imposing a completely crazy movement like Satanism, it will be easier to impose the return of Christianity.

You could say it's the thesis-antithesis-synthesis of the Freemasons. But it's not. Because synthesis implies a state that lasts a long time and doesn't lead to a new state (or at least not before a long time). Here, it's just a succession of different thesis-antitheses, with the antithesis of the previous phase becoming the thesis of the next. It's permanent action-reaction. A constantly evolving series of scams, each building on the previous one(s).

 

History and future of Southeast Asia

Here's a new publication on the Asian zone. This time, it's about Southeast Asia. With this document, plus the previous one about China, the past and future of the whole of Asia are revealed.

It's only partly about World War 3. So, it's a bit of a departure from the blog's theme. But, since it's now possible to make forecasts that go much further into the future, it would be a shame not to cover this subject.

Once again, given the length of the document, I've published it as a PDF.

Practical detail: reading in Google Drive apparently doesn't allow chapters to be displayed in the sidebar. Yet these are very useful for navigating through the document. So I suggest you load it and then open it with a PDF reader or your browser.

As usual, the document is available in English and French:

 

History and future of southeast asia.pdf

L'histoire et l'avenir du sud-est de l'Asie.pdf

The history of China, Mongolia and Russia

Thinking about the Great Wall of China, I ended up developing a somewhat advanced analysis of the history of China, Mongolia and Russia. And it has a few links to the Third World War and what happens afterwards. Here it is available as a pdf, in English and French.

 

The history of China, Mongolia and Russia in English (pdf)

L'histoire de la Chine, la Mongolie et la Russie, en français (pdf)

 

The presidential election of 2020 and the future civil war in the USA

With the turmoil of the current presidential election, I'm beginning to understand how the elite will set up civil war in America. Now that things are settling down, it's becoming pretty clear.

Until now, it wasn't. Given the very cordial side of American political life, one wondered where a possible civil war could come from.

The fact that Trump was a kind of populist was clearly a first step towards a more anti-immigrant state. But it didn't say much about how a civil war would develop in the future.

And he was more of an American-style populist, that is a rather soft one. And the American economy seemed to have improved under Trump. And when the economy is doing well, it's harder to introduce political tensions. So, there was apparently still no reason for the US to go to civil war. The elements that could trigger it seemed to happen in the future and therefore were still unknown for the time being.

 

But with what is happening now, a pattern is taking shape.

Indeed, during the presidential campaign, there was a very strong increase in tension between Democrats and Republicans. Until now, the American elections have been a tennis match between gentlemen in white suits. Everything was played with total fairplay and everyone respected each other. All of a sudden, in each camp, there was a demonization of the other camp that had never been seen before in American political life. You almost had the impression of being in France when an election opposes the RN (ex-FN) to another party.

Why this demonization of each camp?

Let's look first at the Democrat side.

First, the anti-immigrant nationalists are on Trump's side. And Trump has clearly been on this line, with the construction of the wall on the Mexican border. So, for the democrats, the Trumpist camp is composed of racists. Not Nazis, but not far away.

Trump also questioned the theory of global warming, something that has become almost a religion in the Democrat camp. And Trump's voters are following him down that road. In a concrete way, Trump pushed for the development of shale gas. He questioned the Paris climate agreements. So, for the Democrats, Trump is a public danger that threatens the planet.

Now let's look at the Republican side.

For some time now (2 or 3 years), anti-illuminati conspirationists has been on Trump's side, and Democrat politicians are considered by a small but growing number of Republicans to be the devil's representatives on earth. For them, Democrats are illuminati agents whose plan is to create an evil dystopian society, or even to bring the devil and his demons to earth.

And even without going that far, many Republicans totally reject the society that the Democrats want to impose, where homosexuality, ultra-feminism, political correctness and therefore censorship, mass surveillance, euthanasia, idiocracy, etc.., are promoted in a practically dictatorial way. It is indeed a real daily mass propaganda that is made in the media on these themes. Thus, even without the evocation of supernatural occult forces, the Democrat camp seems to be leading America towards a dystopia for a good part of the Republicans.

The two camps thus have more and more valid reasons to hate each other. And you can count on the elite-paid agitators to continue to heat up the minds at boiling point.