Why is Saudi Arabia building and developing numerous villages and small towns in the desert? For the Greater Israel project

 

version française en pdf (ici)

 

When we look at maps of Saudi Arabia, we see that there are many villages and small towns in desert or semi-desert areas. This can be seen on this map showing the western part of the country:

 

 

And if we continue eastward, we have this:

 

Moreover, for many years now, Saudi Arabia has been heavily developing its major cities.

You might wonder why Saudi Arabia is multiplying its residential areas. Given that the population is down to 2.39 children per woman by 2022, a figure that is constantly falling, and that Saudi Arabia has no recourse to immigration, it doesn't make much sense.

The answer is that it's all part of the Greater Israel project. Israel is going to invade Saudi Arabia and colonize it. It will settle settlers all over the country (initially Jewish settlers; but in the long term, the real aim is to settle non-Jewish whites). As a result, the elite is having the necessary infrastructure built by Saudi Arabia.

In other words, Saudi Arabia builds the infrastructure that will serve its future invaders. And the Saudi government does this knowingly, of course, since it is controlled by the elite.

Here is the Greater Israel project:

 

Here, only the north of Saudi Arabia is concerned. But we can be sure that, in time, the whole country will be invaded.

And if Saudi Arabia is building numerous tourist infrastructures, it's for the same reason. The settlers have to be able to enjoy themselves. They have to have a good life. And so, the elite are building leisure zones all over the place.

And the official explanation for this is that the Saudi government realizes it can't rely on oil forever. So it's looking to diversify into tourism.

By the way, the Western media don't talk about the construction of towns and villages. They prefer to keep a low profile on the subject. On the other hand, they do talk about tourist infrastructures and major projects for big cities (skyscrapers, for example), because that's quite visible. And tourists go there. So they can't avoid the subject. And in any case, there's nothing strange or suspicious about it. So it's not a problem to talk about it.

 

That being said, it's possible that before being used by Jewish settlers, then white settlers, these settlements will initially be used to accommodate war refugees from other countries: Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese, etc... Or even Saudis. Since the north will be invaded one day, refugees will have to be accommodated in the south.

 

These considerations lead us to think of another reason for the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East in general. The first is that it helps explain the wars and Western intervention in the region. Oil is a strategic resource. So it's only natural that countries should fight over it. Secondly, it explains the development of urban planning and tourist infrastructures. The Saudis have the money to do this, thanks to oil. And because of the fear of the end of oil, they have the motivation to develop tourism.

And all this thinking is also partly valid for Egypt, and probably Iraq, and other countries in the region, although the analysis must of course be adapted to these different countries.

 

Towards a revival of the Christian religion in the Western world after World War 3?

(Version française)

 

It's possible that the elite will impose a return to a religious society after the third world war. There are pros and cons at this stage. Here's what we can think of as things stand.

The need for a high birth rate after World War 3

 

Firstly, the elite will need a huge number of people to colonize the Middle East and Central America (indeed, on the American side, this is the next objective). What's more, with all the non-whites expelled from Europe and the USA, it will be necessary to repopulate. And for both these objectives, a high birth rate will be needed.

So, it's possible that the elite will impose a semi-Christian theocracy in the West, since the Christian religion encourages people to have children. I say semi-theocracy, because the church may not be in power. But it will have a very strong influence on political and social life.

But the return of religion is not a prerequisite for achieving this goal. In fact, a high birth rate could be achieved by nationalist governments, without the help of religion, via pro-natalist policies.

 

Whether the increase in the birth rate is achieved by a nationalist government or by the rise of religion, it is certain that most Western governments will abolish the right to abortion, as well as the pill. And in the case of France, enshrining this right in the constitution won't change a thing. It'll be abolished anyway.

Similarly, feminism will be totally wiped out. Women will lose most of their rights, including perhaps the right to vote (or at least the latter will be severely restricted).

The rise of masculinist movements is a sign of this. There's nothing spontaneous about them. They are clearly under the control of the elite. Otherwise, all the masculinist videos like MGTOW on Youtube would be deleted immediately. Of course, a number of such videos and channels were suppressed at first, to give the impression of a completely underground movement being hunted down by the official kommandantur. But it's over now. The fact that right from the start, the videos in question received a lot of comments, and practically all of them positive, shows that this is a movement launched by the elite. Otherwise, there would have been only a few comments, of which a third would have been negative, a third neutral/in-between and a third positive. Besides, Jordan Peterson wouldn't be on American television.

 

It also means that all the current ridiculous propaganda about ecology and Gaia dying because there are too many bad human beings will be swept away. Promoting a very high birth rate will run counter to current ecological Malthusianism. So, current ecology won't survive World War III. We'll be rid of this stupid propaganda (e.g. CO2 responsible for global warming). But we'll gain others, just as dumb.

 

The rise of Satanism

 

Another thing in favor of a return of the Christian religion is the fact that the elite are currently actively promoting Satanism.

One reason for this is that the elite want to have two very opposed blocs in the Third World War. By setting up, on the one hand, a bloc made up of nationalists, democrats and partly Satanists (whether officially or unofficially); and on the other hand, a bloc made up of Muslims and conspirationists, the elite will get these two enemy camps. Having Satanists will be enough in itself to motivate Muslims to go to war. And their delusional social project will be enough to make the conspirationists join them.

In this context, fostering Satanism may serve a second purpose for the elite: to help impose the return of the Christian religion in the future. This is the dynamic strategy of the elite. One movement serves to create another through an action-reaction mechanism. By imposing a completely crazy movement like Satanism, it will be easier to impose the return of Christianity.

You could say it's the thesis-antithesis-synthesis of the Freemasons. But it's not. Because synthesis implies a state that lasts a long time and doesn't lead to a new state (or at least not before a long time). Here, it's just a succession of different thesis-antitheses, with the antithesis of the previous phase becoming the thesis of the next. It's permanent action-reaction. A constantly evolving series of scams, each building on the previous one(s).

 

History and future of Southeast Asia

Here's a new publication on the Asian zone. This time, it's about Southeast Asia. With this document, plus the previous one about China, the past and future of the whole of Asia are revealed.

It's only partly about World War 3. So, it's a bit of a departure from the blog's theme. But, since it's now possible to make forecasts that go much further into the future, it would be a shame not to cover this subject.

Once again, given the length of the document, I've published it as a PDF.

Practical detail: reading in Google Drive apparently doesn't allow chapters to be displayed in the sidebar. Yet these are very useful for navigating through the document. So I suggest you load it and then open it with a PDF reader or your browser.

As usual, the document is available in English and French:

 

History and future of southeast asia.pdf

L'histoire et l'avenir du sud-est de l'Asie.pdf

The history of China, Mongolia and Russia

Thinking about the Great Wall of China, I ended up developing a somewhat advanced analysis of the history of China, Mongolia and Russia. And it has a few links to the Third World War and what happens afterwards. Here it is available as a pdf, in English and French.

 

The history of China, Mongolia and Russia in English (pdf)

L'histoire de la Chine, la Mongolie et la Russie, en français (pdf)

 

The presidential election of 2020 and the future civil war in the USA

With the turmoil of the current presidential election, I'm beginning to understand how the elite will set up civil war in America. Now that things are settling down, it's becoming pretty clear.

Until now, it wasn't. Given the very cordial side of American political life, one wondered where a possible civil war could come from.

The fact that Trump was a kind of populist was clearly a first step towards a more anti-immigrant state. But it didn't say much about how a civil war would develop in the future.

And he was more of an American-style populist, that is a rather soft one. And the American economy seemed to have improved under Trump. And when the economy is doing well, it's harder to introduce political tensions. So, there was apparently still no reason for the US to go to civil war. The elements that could trigger it seemed to happen in the future and therefore were still unknown for the time being.

 

But with what is happening now, a pattern is taking shape.

Indeed, during the presidential campaign, there was a very strong increase in tension between Democrats and Republicans. Until now, the American elections have been a tennis match between gentlemen in white suits. Everything was played with total fairplay and everyone respected each other. All of a sudden, in each camp, there was a demonization of the other camp that had never been seen before in American political life. You almost had the impression of being in France when an election opposes the RN (ex-FN) to another party.

Why this demonization of each camp?

Let's look first at the Democrat side.

First, the anti-immigrant nationalists are on Trump's side. And Trump has clearly been on this line, with the construction of the wall on the Mexican border. So, for the democrats, the Trumpist camp is composed of racists. Not Nazis, but not far away.

Trump also questioned the theory of global warming, something that has become almost a religion in the Democrat camp. And Trump's voters are following him down that road. In a concrete way, Trump pushed for the development of shale gas. He questioned the Paris climate agreements. So, for the Democrats, Trump is a public danger that threatens the planet.

Now let's look at the Republican side.

For some time now (2 or 3 years), anti-illuminati conspirationists has been on Trump's side, and Democrat politicians are considered by a small but growing number of Republicans to be the devil's representatives on earth. For them, Democrats are illuminati agents whose plan is to create an evil dystopian society, or even to bring the devil and his demons to earth.

And even without going that far, many Republicans totally reject the society that the Democrats want to impose, where homosexuality, ultra-feminism, political correctness and therefore censorship, mass surveillance, euthanasia, idiocracy, etc.., are promoted in a practically dictatorial way. It is indeed a real daily mass propaganda that is made in the media on these themes. Thus, even without the evocation of supernatural occult forces, the Democrat camp seems to be leading America towards a dystopia for a good part of the Republicans.

The two camps thus have more and more valid reasons to hate each other. And you can count on the elite-paid agitators to continue to heat up the minds at boiling point.

 

Race Mixing as a Racist Pro-White Project

With the plan of mass immigration and promotion of race mixing currently being imposed by the elite in the West, there is a very significant increase in the number of black/white and Arab/white mixed-race people in Europe and black/white and Latino/white in America.

One wonders what will happen to all these mestizos after the 3rd World War. Will the elite simply exterminate them? At first glance, I don't think so. Maybe some of them will disappear during the war. But most of them should survive.

In my opinion, the elite will expel them to Africa. They'll use this to partially whitewash this continent. Then they'll be able to bring in more and more white people.

So, in fact, the current race-mixing trend serves the elite's racist pro-white agenda.

The people who are currently mixing are convinced that by doing so, they're using the ultimate weapon against racism. But in reality, the exact opposite is happening. Instead, they are serving white supremacism. What an irony.

Thus, it strongly suggests that the next part of the world to undergo the racist project of the elite will be Africa. It makes sense to me. Once they've whitewashed North America and the Middle East, the elite obviously won't stop there. And the next few targets are not many. It's either Asia, India, Africa or South America. And since Africa is closer and poses a greater threat to the integrity of the white race than Asia and South America, it is likely that it will be the focus of the next elite whitening plan.

Perhaps it will be Africa and South America. Indeed, one wonders what will become of the mixed-race Latinos in America. But, as Africa is a big chunk, the elite will probably focus mainly on that continent. In that case, perhaps some of the Latinos in question will go to South America and some to Africa. We shall see.

All this will take time, probably 200 years or more. So, in addition to predicting what will happen in the next 70 years, we can foresee approximately what will happen in the next 200 or 300 years. If my analysis is correct, of course.

PS:

And the Africans will not be able to refuse these immigrants, since they will be partly racial brothers, who are moreover attached to African culture. So how to say no to their coming? And in any case, Africans will have no choice. Here as elsewhere, it is the elite who decide and the people who obey.

We can think that some of the whites who will have allied themselves with the blacks and Arabs in Europe will also be expelled to Africa. As a result, they will help to whiten this continent a little more. The elite will probably make sure that a substantial part of them will not assimilate, which will allow the first white colonies to be established there. So these people, who will be among the most anti-racist, will be forced to serve a totally racist project. Furthermore, the elite will manage to make their children become more and more racist over the generations so that they will approve of the white colonization project.

That's what happened in Israel. Those who arrived in the 1930s and 1940s were mostly anti-racist and anti-xenophobic. And now, a lot of their grandchildren are xenophobes, or even uninhibited racists. A number of these elders must be disgusted with what has become of their people. And some of them are letting it be known. But they're out of touch. They are people of the past. As their xenophobic or racist grandchildren will become when they are no longer needed by the elite.

It's the same with the communists. They saw themselves as the future of the world in the post-wwII years, then they became totally old-fashioned and their ideas rejected by their children once the elite no longer needed communism. Among the people of this generation, the most adaptable/opportunistic evolved, people of conviction and psychorigids continued to believe in it and became relics of the past.

PS2:

It is possible that the elite use Asian immigration to Africa to justify European intervention. They will make Asians act obnoxious against Africans. As a result, Africans will be more than happy to welcome white people back. In addition, if African countries accept mass Asian immigration, they will find it difficult to justify refusing mass European immigration. But well, this is a prediction based on the growing influence of the Chinese in Africa that is currently underway. But over the next 200 years, that could very well change and this hypothesis could become obsolete.

PS3:

And regarding the colonization of Africa by white people after WWIII, the birth rate won't be a problem. At that point, the elite will ensure that the white one increase sharply, while the black one collapse. As a result, the migration balance will turn in favor of whites in Africa and eventually South America. But this time, there will be no turning back. At the end of the process, there will be no blacks at all and very few Latinos.

Historical revisionism was a creation of the elite

I became interested in revisionism in the late 1980s. And especially from 1990, when the Fabius-Gayssot law, which banned revisionist opinions, was passed in France. Of course, from that date on, I was convinced that the revisionists were right. If a government bans an opinion so hysterically, it is most certainly true. But finding books on the subject was almost impossible because of the ban. As a result, I was only able to discover revisionist writings in 1996, through the Internet, by going to the famous Aaargh site. And from the very first articles, I received confirmation that the Holocaust was a pure invention.

Of course, this very quickly led me to become interested in the career of the most famous revisionists, including Faurisson. From the outset, two or three things made me slightly twitch. At the time, not being in the extreme conspiracy, I let pass this strange information. But as I became more and more conspirationist, and thinking back on this information a few years ago, I had more and more doubts. Especially since I had discovered in the early 2000s that many of the new stars of revisionism were in fact agents.

Over the last 3 or 4 years, I began to think that the first dissident movements had probably been set up by the authorities to launch conspirationnism among the masses. There, I began to think that revisionism was one of these movements.

But since I did not see too much use for revisionism for the masters of the world outside of that, since I was thinking about other things and since Faurisson was still a monument in my mind, I had left it at that; even if my doubts were becoming more and more important.

But, since I understood, a few months ago, that the Israel project must be a racist pro-white project and that a large part of the Jews of the diaspora will most likely be deported to Israel before and during World War III, there, the role of revisionism, in addition to participating in the rise of the conspirationnist movement, became very clear to me. Its primary goal was to raise "anti-Semitism" in order to send Jews from the diaspora to Israel. It confirmed that revisionism was indeed a project of the elite.

This was very difficult to understand for a very long time as also because, until about 10 years ago, the revisionist movement remained a niche trend, something known only to a few ultra-conspirationnists. So it was hard to think that it could be of any use to the elite in any way. It's only in the last few years that we feel that revisionism is starting to come out of its ghetto and that we can glimpse its role.

And of course, the Fabius-Gayssot law in France was created on purpose to advertise revisionism. It was not made to bury it, but to spread it. A law that prohibits a historical research movement is a clear signal that this movement is right and that the government is trying to hide the truth. Once again, for 30 years, the true purpose of this law did not emerge, because revisionism has remained a small group. Thus, the situation was consistent with the apparent purpose of this law, namely, to destroy revisionism. But it's getting clear, now that revisionism is becoming more widespread, that the aim was actually to propagate it. It just took 20 years for it to become clear. The operation was meant to act with delay. So the real goal was unsuspected.

And the development of revisionism will increase anti-Semitism. Revisionists have been viciously persecuted for decades. Most Western countries have enacted anti-revisionist laws and others to combat anti-Semitism. Obviously, in the minds of people who have understood the scam of the holocaust will grow the idea that the Jews control the world and that they are truly ruthless and obnoxious tyrants. And it's not just revisionism that's used for that. There are also many revelations made elsewhere about Jewish power. Many Jewish-critical leaders have also been martyred. Jews are more and more associated with Satanism, the migration invasion, etc... In short, the evidence on the existence of occult Jewish power and on its odious and destructive character is accumulating, all provided by the elite in reality. On this basis, the elite will be able to justify the coming to power of anti-Jewish political movements (an alliance of Muslims, leftists and conspirationists), and then the expulsion of some or all European Jews to Israel (and even American ones). This will ensure that there will be enough people to colonize the greater Israel that will be created around World War III. And after the greater Israel, will come the colonization of the whole Middle East by the whites.

 

That's why the extermination evidence is ridiculous on every level. It's because the elite wanted some people to understand that it was a scam.

If the elite had wanted the Holocaust to look real, they would have had no problem making it look like that. As Hitler was an agent of the elite, he would then have ordered his secret service to produce thousands of false documents to prove that an extermination project was being carried out. The German authorities could have put thousands of bodies of German and Russian soldiers killed in combat in pits near concentration camps; and even civilians dead in hospitals and without families. They could have made private videos of Hitler declaring his extermination intentions to his trusted ministers. All this would have been "discovered" by totally "independent" observers. And then no one could have doubted the reality of the Holocaust. If the elite did not do this, it was because they wanted people to realize the deception as soon as they looked closely at the evidence of the Holocaust. They wanted the lie of the Shoah to be exposed and that many people end up no longer believing it.

It's like the Islamist attacks right now, they have to be staged and the deception often has to be completely grotesque for many people to understand that it is all false and to switch to the conspirationist side.

 In fact, even assuming that Hitler was not an agent of the elite, it would have been possible for the victors to create false documents, to have apparently reliable, credible and neutral witnesses, and thus to produce seemingly irrefutable evidence. If they did not do so, it is because they wanted us to find out that this holocaust story is bogus. And, of course, since it wasn't ordinary people who were going to dare to ask these questions, they put agents to do the job. In any case, the elite obviously would not have wanted ordinary people to question the lie. It could have been dangerous, because they could have asked themselves embarrassing questions (as I do now). So it had to be agents who did the job.

As the document is very long, i put it here in PDF format. And since the translation will take some times, I put it here first in french. The english version will follow.

Robert Faurisson, très probablement un agent V.2

 

October 21, 2020. Finally, I have translated the text in English:

 

Robert Faurisson, most probably an agent

During the translation, I have heavily modified two subparts of the document (thus de second version of the french text). The one about the attacks of Faurisson (subpart 1.10.3 "Details and thoughts about the attacks"), and the one in appendix 8 (A. 8.6: The problem of developing revisionism 2.0 in the USA in the 45-70s).