Here's a new publication on the Asian zone. This time, it's about Southeast Asia. With this document, plus the previous one about China, the past and future of the whole of Asia are revealed.
It's only partly about World War 3. So, it's a bit of a departure from the blog's theme. But, since it's now possible to make forecasts that go much further into the future, it would be a shame not to cover this subject.
Once again, given the length of the document, I've published it as a PDF.
Practical detail: reading in Google Drive apparently doesn't allow chapters to be displayed in the sidebar. Yet these are very useful for navigating through the document. So I suggest you load it and then open it with a PDF reader or your browser.
As usual, the document is available in English and French:
History and future of southeast asia.pdf
L'histoire et l'avenir du sud-est de l'Asie.pdf
Hi, i read your theory on white elite ruling the world and was wondering if i could pick your brain on the subject. I want to believe you but there are many holes in your story.
RépondreSupprimerTell me
RépondreSupprimerYou think all whites are equal. The elite settled western russia with white slavs, but they are nothing compared to pure germans, speaking as a slav here. Eastern, southeastern europe never was and never will be rich and powerful as western europe, we just look white but we aren't the same.
SupprimerWhy did the elite mix portuguesse with blacks, which ruined them because whitewashing doesn't work. Once you mix pure, true whites i.e. germanic whites you can't go back.
Why can't the elite be descendants of Phoenicians (now mainly known as Jews), as Miles Mathis claims, and merely using the white race for its colonial aims? If we're going to posit the existence of a power above our "usual suspects" we have to identity who they are. All the positions of wealth and power are held by our usual suspects, so who are these white people who are secretly in charge?
RépondreSupprimerYou might find this man interesting regarding your fascinating theory about the 'Australian aborigines'. The Tindale family have been involved in very many scams and hoaxes over the years. Keep up the excellent work! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Tindale
RépondreSupprimerRegarding colonization, I've already answered this question in my recent articles. It's because if the Jews had controlled all the land for a long time, they didn't need white people to develop Siberia and Australia. From an economic point of view, there was no point. The Asians were already right next door.
RépondreSupprimerAnd since we've eliminated the economic hypothesis, what could have been the purpose of the Jewish leaders in having white people colonize Siberia and Australia? It just doesn't make sense anymore. On the other hand, if you have a pro-white racist elite, it makes perfect sense.
Also, it must mean that those who did this have no desire to destroy the white race. Otherwise, they would have settled Asians in Siberia and Australia. Which eliminates the hypothesis of the Jews exterminating the white race. Yet much of the current criticism of Jews is based on the idea that they want to exterminate us through immigration and miscegenation. If this isn't the case, everything becomes very unclear as to their aims.
Now, when I still believed that the Jews were the leaders of the world, I theorized that their aim was to get the whites to side with the Jews by creating a common enemy (the Arabs), so that they could create the greater Israel.
But, in that case, the usefulness of whites would be limited to the Middle East. Why go and have whites colonize Siberia and Australia when there are Asians right next door who can do the job? Again, if we're dealing with a pro-white elite, that's understandable.
And then, if the elite is Jewish, why make all these political movements, all these ethnic tensions, all these wars, outside Europe and the Middle East (and possibly the USA)? It's of no interest to Jewish leaders. Since they already control the whole earth, they can leave these areas in peace. Normally, all they care about is the economic exploitation of the goys in those areas. For Europe and the Middle East, there are political motivations linked to Israel. But for Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, etc., it's of no use to them.
As for the fact that all those in positions of power are our usual suspects, even when I still believed in the Jewish hypothesis, it always seemed to me to be a relatively weak argument. That's why I approached the problem in a different way, by analyzing the motives behind their actions.
RépondreSupprimerThe problem is that the elite who run us may well have set up Jewish frontmen (and others declared to be Jewish, but who aren't), while running things in the background. So, those we know aren't necessarily the real rulers of the world, and basing everything on that is risky. The Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other Jewish leaders may well be nothing more than puppets. And if so, who's behind them? We don't know. It could be other, even more powerful, but unknown Jews. But it could be another elite. Hence the importance of analyzing the motives and goals of the elite and seeing which of the two hypotheses (Jew vs. other) is the most credible. And when we analyze the situation, there are too many things that go against the Jewish hypothesis.
Of course, Miles Mathis has established many family links between the various men of power and other famous figures. But, if the elite is non-Jewish, uses Jews and only some of the Jewish leaders are actually Jewish, then it's impossible to know from names alone who is Jewish and who is part of a white elite that manipulates Jews. If you take a politician with a Jewish name (like Levy or Goldberg), he may well be a mere Jewish puppet, or a Jew in the lower circles of the elite, or a non-Jewish member of the elite. The name and religion displayed do not tell the tale.
The limitation of Miles Mathis's analysis is that the goals he attributes to the Jews do not explain the current events. He doesn't elaborate much, but apparently, for him, the goal is essentially economic. And occasionally, it's to martyrize the goys through wars, economic crises, etc... That's not enough to explain current and future events. As a result, he makes no forward-looking analysis. He only analyzes the past and the present, and that, providing a rather poor explanation for the actions of the elite he believes to be Jewish. As rich and impressive as his analysis is, it's not forward-thinking, and it doesn't explain the whys and wherefores of events. With each article, he demonstrates a little more that there is an elite that has been in place for centuries and controls the world. He catalogs (supposedly Jewish) scams, which is fine. But that's as far as it goes.
We need to go further than that. Now that we know that there's an elite running the world, and that it's been there for a very long time, we need to study the reasons for their actions and make a prospective analysis. We have to do elitology.
Having said that, I completely understand people sticking to the Jewish hypothesis. I still believed in it not so long ago, as you can see from my other blog on World War2, which is entirely based on this hypothesis. Given the scale of the manipulation, it's hard to say who's at the top. But, in my opinion, those who stick with it are going to get screwed. The elite are going to get rid of the Jews. And with that, all Judeo-critical conspirationism will collapse, since the suspects will have disappeared.
I think you're likely to be correct, the elite do have a long and convoluted plan to conquer and then settle the known world with "white people". Nobody else has noticed apart from you, and this deserves special mention. So, bravo!
SupprimerHowever, my point is still this, couldn't the elite still be Phoenician/ Jewish but just using the white race as a kind of proxy for their own imperial intentions? And you said "but why bother using whites, in that case?" And the answer is because they're essentially white themselves (although they don't see themselves as white, or any race, perhaps, they merely operate chiefly through the white race in a practical sense; whom they thoroughly infiltrated thousands of years ago).
So would it therefore be correct to call them "pro white?". As really white people are just their preferred slave race? If that makes sense? To call them "pro white" they'd need to have some kind of genuine love or respect for white people, and that definitely doesn't seem to be the case! Or am I wrong? Thanks for your thought inspiring writings, as always.
I never said that the elite think all whites are equal. Indeed, they must consider the Nordic and Germanic peoples to be superior to the others. And it's safe to assume that they'll expand their territory as they expand the white world.
RépondreSupprimerSo, probably after total victory over the other races, there will still be internal movements within the white race to increase the living space of these ethnic groups. Perhaps the elite will get rid of the Slavs and Latins. Or they may leave a limited number that cannot threaten the Germanic and Nordic races.
You may notice that, apart from Siberia, the 2 other major territories colonized by whites (the USA and Australia) were settled by fairly pure whites.
If WW2 was staged, does that mean millions of white didn't die in it?
RépondreSupprimerIn this paper, plus the one on china and russia, you say that ancient civilizations are faked, with made up histories, how is this even possible? Ancient rome, greece, egypt never existed, do you have any hard evidence to support this?
Why wasn't Hitler used by the elites to conquer the world for germanic race and exterminate all others? Whites now are to weak and cowardly to conquer like wehrmacht and SS could have.
Will you publish another long study of some region, with more evidence i hope, in the future?
Of course there weren't millions of deaths. Maybe there were a few tens of thousands, so that they could have real cases to put forward to people who might doubt the reality of the events. But more than 99% of the deaths are pure invention. We can also assume that on the battlefields, there were many fake nurses who brought back fake wounded and dead, so that the soldiers could bear witness to the "reality" of war. And there are probably other techniques for making all this look real that I haven't yet discovered.
RépondreSupprimerAnd it's the same in Ukraine right now.
About ancient civilizations, you'll have to check out the Recentist sites. But I can already give you a few elements. Essentially, there are objects, statues and buildings that can't date back 2,000 years. There are buildings, statues and various objects in extremely hard stone that could never have been fashioned with bronze tools. And even with iron tools, it would have been almost impossible to do, and in any case, it would have taken so long that it would have been totally crazy. Clearly, these stones were in fact cast, like concrete, a technique that only dates back to the 19th century (or rather, the 18th century, according to recentists).
Regarding the Incas, Mayans, Aztecs, etc., there are hard stone constructions with crazy shapes (the stones, not the constructions). Not only would this have been impossible to do, but no one could have had any reason to give such absurd shapes to these stones. So, not only does this mean that they, too, have been molded. But it also means that the designers of the scam clearly wanted to mock ordinary people by putting the truth in front of them without them being able to see it.
As for Egypt, it's clear what the invention of this civilization was for. It served to validate Israel's thousand-year-old history. In the same way, the story of Jesus probably serves in part to do just that (in addition to the main purpose of serving for the Christian religion).
As far as Hitler is concerned, apparently the elite want to stay hidden. As a result, they make events very convoluted and complicated, so that nobody understands what's going on. If the Germans had conquered huge territories all at once, it might have been suspicious. But with the current mess, no one understands what's going on, so the elite can move their pawns quietly. It also seems that the elite don't want the white population to go soft. So putting them in perpetual danger allows them to do just that. But perhaps there are other explanations.
And the whites will march when the elite tell them to march, weak or not weak. And they will think what the elite tell them to think. To take an extreme example, when the state calls young men into the army in wartime, they have no choice. Otherwise, they're executed. Hardly anyone goes into battle out of patriotism, but out of fear of court martial. More generally, the apparent moral degeneracy of whites is organized by the elite because they need to stage a collapse of the West. In other words, whites are weak because the elite wants them to be weak. And when it wants them to be strong, they'll be strong. That's not a problem at all.
I have no plans at the moment regarding other regions of the world. It depends on the inspiration of the moment. Right now, I've got an idea about the Great Wall of China. And then everything else came along. So, maybe I'll do a new article, maybe not.