Historical revisionism was a creation of the elite

I became interested in revisionism in the late 1980s. And especially from 1990, when the Fabius-Gayssot law, which banned revisionist opinions, was passed in France. Of course, from that date on, I was convinced that the revisionists were right. If a government bans an opinion so hysterically, it is most certainly true. But finding books on the subject was almost impossible because of the ban. As a result, I was only able to discover revisionist writings in 1996, through the Internet, by going to the famous Aaargh site. And from the very first articles, I received confirmation that the Holocaust was a pure invention.

Of course, this very quickly led me to become interested in the career of the most famous revisionists, including Faurisson. From the outset, two or three things made me slightly twitch. At the time, not being in the extreme conspiracy, I let pass this strange information. But as I became more and more conspirationist, and thinking back on this information a few years ago, I had more and more doubts. Especially since I had discovered in the early 2000s that many of the new stars of revisionism were in fact agents.

Over the last 3 or 4 years, I began to think that the first dissident movements had probably been set up by the authorities to launch conspirationnism among the masses. There, I began to think that revisionism was one of these movements.

But since I did not see too much use for revisionism for the masters of the world outside of that, since I was thinking about other things and since Faurisson was still a monument in my mind, I had left it at that; even if my doubts were becoming more and more important.

But, since I understood, a few months ago, that the Israel project must be a racist pro-white project and that a large part of the Jews of the diaspora will most likely be deported to Israel before and during World War III, there, the role of revisionism, in addition to participating in the rise of the conspirationnist movement, became very clear to me. Its primary goal was to raise "anti-Semitism" in order to send Jews from the diaspora to Israel. It confirmed that revisionism was indeed a project of the elite.

This was very difficult to understand for a very long time as also because, until about 10 years ago, the revisionist movement remained a niche trend, something known only to a few ultra-conspirationnists. So it was hard to think that it could be of any use to the elite in any way. It's only in the last few years that we feel that revisionism is starting to come out of its ghetto and that we can glimpse its role.

And of course, the Fabius-Gayssot law in France was created on purpose to advertise revisionism. It was not made to bury it, but to spread it. A law that prohibits a historical research movement is a clear signal that this movement is right and that the government is trying to hide the truth. Once again, for 30 years, the true purpose of this law did not emerge, because revisionism has remained a small group. Thus, the situation was consistent with the apparent purpose of this law, namely, to destroy revisionism. But it's getting clear, now that revisionism is becoming more widespread, that the aim was actually to propagate it. It just took 20 years for it to become clear. The operation was meant to act with delay. So the real goal was unsuspected.

And the development of revisionism will increase anti-Semitism. Revisionists have been viciously persecuted for decades. Most Western countries have enacted anti-revisionist laws and others to combat anti-Semitism. Obviously, in the minds of people who have understood the scam of the holocaust will grow the idea that the Jews control the world and that they are truly ruthless and obnoxious tyrants. And it's not just revisionism that's used for that. There are also many revelations made elsewhere about Jewish power. Many Jewish-critical leaders have also been martyred. Jews are more and more associated with Satanism, the migration invasion, etc... In short, the evidence on the existence of occult Jewish power and on its odious and destructive character is accumulating, all provided by the elite in reality. On this basis, the elite will be able to justify the coming to power of anti-Jewish political movements (an alliance of Muslims, leftists and conspirationists), and then the expulsion of some or all European Jews to Israel (and even American ones). This will ensure that there will be enough people to colonize the greater Israel that will be created around World War III. And after the greater Israel, will come the colonization of the whole Middle East by the whites.

 

That's why the extermination evidence is ridiculous on every level. It's because the elite wanted some people to understand that it was a scam.

If the elite had wanted the Holocaust to look real, they would have had no problem making it look like that. As Hitler was an agent of the elite, he would then have ordered his secret service to produce thousands of false documents to prove that an extermination project was being carried out. The German authorities could have put thousands of bodies of German and Russian soldiers killed in combat in pits near concentration camps; and even civilians dead in hospitals and without families. They could have made private videos of Hitler declaring his extermination intentions to his trusted ministers. All this would have been "discovered" by totally "independent" observers. And then no one could have doubted the reality of the Holocaust. If the elite did not do this, it was because they wanted people to realize the deception as soon as they looked closely at the evidence of the Holocaust. They wanted the lie of the Shoah to be exposed and that many people end up no longer believing it.

It's like the Islamist attacks right now, they have to be staged and the deception often has to be completely grotesque for many people to understand that it is all false and to switch to the conspirationist side.

 In fact, even assuming that Hitler was not an agent of the elite, it would have been possible for the victors to create false documents, to have apparently reliable, credible and neutral witnesses, and thus to produce seemingly irrefutable evidence. If they did not do so, it is because they wanted us to find out that this holocaust story is bogus. And, of course, since it wasn't ordinary people who were going to dare to ask these questions, they put agents to do the job. In any case, the elite obviously would not have wanted ordinary people to question the lie. It could have been dangerous, because they could have asked themselves embarrassing questions (as I do now). So it had to be agents who did the job.

As the document is very long, i put it here in PDF format. And since the translation will take some times, I put it here first in french. The english version will follow.

Robert Faurisson, très probablement un agent V.2

 

October 21, 2020. Finally, I have translated the text in English:

 

Robert Faurisson, most probably an agent

During the translation, I have heavily modified two subparts of the document (thus de second version of the french text). The one about the attacks of Faurisson (subpart 1.10.3 "Details and thoughts about the attacks"), and the one in appendix 8 (A. 8.6: The problem of developing revisionism 2.0 in the USA in the 45-70s).

The march against islamophobia, in France

On Sunday 10 November 2019, a march against Islamophobia was organized in France in Paris. It gathered 13,500 people.

It is an interesting event to analyze.

Indeed, we have seen on this blog that in France, the elite will bring to power a coalition of Muslims and conspirationists.

We can think that this is one of the first concrete steps towards the constitution of a Muslim political movement in France. It starts with a march against Islamophobia, then leaders will emerge. And these leaders, after having gone through occasional actions to fight Islamophobia, will start to form organizations against Islamophobia, then they or new leaders will create Muslim parties, first to defend their rights, then to impose Islam in France.

It can be noted here that the Islamophobia promoted for many years in the media will thus have a double utility for the elite. It will continue to excite the white world against Islam, as it has done for more than 15 years. But we can see here that it will also help to promote Muslim movements. By becoming excessive, it justifies a reaction from the Muslim side, and therefore gradually the creation of organizations against Islamophobia (then, movements for Muslim rights, etc...).

Once again, we can see that the elite likes to kill two (or three) birds with one stone.

In addition, Mélenchon, a well-known far-left leader in France, gave them his support. The fact that Mélenchon supported them is also logical.  Currently, it was necessary to support these movements against Islamophobia so that it did not seem to be only a movement of Islamists (and also Arabs and Blacks). And since the classical socialist left is more or less anti-Islamist nowadays, it was necessary to use an extreme left movement for that.

Will the Jews of the USA and France be expelled to Israel?

While thinking about my previous paper and the expansion program of the State of Israel, I had an idea about the Jews of the United States and France.  What if the elite were planning to expel them to Israel before and during World War III?

Until then, I had told myself that this was unlikely, because I thought that the presence of everyday Jews served the Jewish/illuminati elite to control the USA and France. So I didn't think about it more than that.

But if the objective of the elite is actually to spread the white race, and Jews only serve as fanatical white settlers, then it is different. All ordinary Jews will be used for this purpose.

Moreover, when you think about it a little more, it is clear that the Greater Israel project will suddenly require a rather large population inflow. It is true that Israel's Jews have a fairly high birth rate (near 3.2 children per woman). But that may not be enough when large territories are annexed by Israel. It will therefore require a massive and rapid influx of people.

And even if the goal was not to increase the territory of the white race, but the one of the Jews, we saw for the 2nd World War that the elite had no problem deporting Jews. So, to the extent that they will most likely be necessary to populate the Greater Israel, whether the real objective of the elite is the expansion of the white race or the expansion of the Jews, it will not change anything for them. They will be moved to Israel. 

It is true that in this region, there is mostly desert. This too must have unconsciously made me think that the inflow of Jews from the USA and France was not necessary. But in fact, there are quite a lot of people in this area. It's not just desert everywhere. So, there will still be a need for many settlers to occupy the territories taken.

Especially since, as we have seen, it is likely that, in reality, the Greater Israel project is underestimated and that the entire Middle East will be targeted by this white race expansion project. So it will require a very large number of settlers.

Thus, it becomes likely that the Jews from the USA and France will be expelled in order to occupy the territories taken from the Arabs when  the Greater Israel is established. Why them in particular? Well, because of their numbers. These are the two countries with the highest number of Jews outside Israel. The Jews of the USA are in the 5.7 million, those of France probably in the 600,000 (see here). That's 6,300,000 that could be used as settlers. But in the United States, there would be 10 million Jews if you take a broader definition of Jews. So that could be 10.6 million Jews who could be mobilized to colonize the greater Israel. Of course, it is possible that Jews from other countries may also be targeted, such as those from Italy (see the map of countries that will come under Muslim control before World War III).

Does the Israel project really serve to bring back the Jewish people who would have been expelled 2000 years earlier?

The most common theory among conspiracy theorists who believe in Jewish conspiracy is that the creation of the state of Israel is the result of a conspiracy by Jewish leaders to bring the Jewish people back to the lands from which they were driven 2000 years ago. Jewish leaders would have gradually taken control of all Western countries with the aim not only of being masters of the world, but also of recreating Israel. Once this is done, an additional objective would be to make Israel the world's capital. Moreover, Freemasonry is said to be a creation of Jewish leaders. It would be an intermediate power created to have the elite of the goys applying the orders of Jewish leaders.

That's what I thought until a few years ago.

On the surface, it seems to make sense as an idea. Indeed, there appears to have been a takeover of the various European countries by Jewish leaders over the past 500 years. The first country would have been Italy with the Medici, then England with Cromwell, then probably the USA during the colonization, then France with the 1789 revolution, then most European countries with the takeover of Europe by the French under Napoleon, and finally Russia in 1917.  And for Freemasons, some say that Freemasons' rites are Jewish from A to Z.

As for the desire to recreate the state of Israel, it seems logical, since, according to their sacred books, it is the land promised by God and they actually lived there for several centuries before being driven out. And since Jews have remained very religious for centuries, it is normal that they wanted to return to the land that God had promised them. However, before the end of the 19th century, we don't have much evidence that they were making a plan to get back there. But from then on, things became clear (writings by Nathan Birnbaum from 1882, book by Theodore Herzl "The State of the Jews" in 1896, Balfour declaration in 1917, San Remo conference in 1920, etc...). Moreover, we can think that the desire to take power in Europe, then in the world, is a strong indication of this desire to return to Israel, beyond the mere desire for domination.

The reason why there are all those satanic signs and themes in movies, songs, events, etc…

With what I have already said on the subject, namely that the system sets up an opposition between whites and Arabs/black people in Europe at the racial level and an opposition between Satanists/normal people and democrats/despots at the level of ideas, you can understand why we have had more and more movies since the 1990s on the theme of Satanism or including more or less references to Satanism inside. The same goes for video clips, song lyrics, and various events.

 If you want to set up a Satanist/normal opposition, people who could oppose Satanism must already know that there is a hidden Satanist force. And since there was no sign of such a force until then, there was no reason for anyone to suspect it. Therefore, it was necessary to reveal its existence through the different means of communication. Hence all these films, video clips, and illuminati signs by famous people, etc....

And it must be revealed in a fairly clear way. Since until then, no one was aware of the existence of this Satanist orientation of the ruling elite, and since it is something quite incredible, just giving vague clues, things that are a little too obscure would make it almost impossible for anyone to be convinced. So the elite had to put signs and clues that will leave no doubt to conscious people that the elite is committed to Satanism. That's why we have more and more obvious signs that are shown in movies or by famous people and that's why we have artists who say squarely they have sold their souls to the devil, and things like that.

And of course, for those who would not understand the apparent evidence on their own, there are websites and videos on Youtube denouncing the satanic/illuminati plot to inform them and get things perfectly clear.

But, since the illuminatis do not want to convert everyone to anti-Satanism, it mustn't be overly disclosed. So that's why it's not displayed in such a way that even the mass of ordinary people would become aware of it either. It's still opaque enough so that only the most knowledgeable and conscious people understand.

And then there is the safeguard of anti-conspiracy discourse. Most people will not dare to believe that the elite is corrupt and Satanist, because that would be conspirationism and, in their heads, it is the speech of half-crazy guys. With this mental barrier, ordinary people will think that the signs they see in movies or shows, are just a fashion. For films specifically, they will think that it is just one theme among others, something that appeals to young people, and that's why it often comes up. Or they will see it as a sign of a degeneration of society, but will not go any further. And for the music videos, they will think that the singers introduce these themes only to shock.

In addition, many people will focus on Islamists. This will be the case for many nationalists. For them, the real threat is Muslim immigrants. So they will not focus, or not much, on all these illuminati and satanic signs. They will attribute moral and sexual decadence to leftism without going any further. And the leaders of the nationalist camp, who are all agents of influence in the service of the elite, will do everything to divert those people from the idea of a Satanist conspiracy and instead make them focus on the problem of the Islamists. And they are already doing that by saying that the decadence of the mores comes from leftists, the legacy of the sexual revolution of the sixties, feminism, the questioning of authority in all its forms, the child king, the homosexual lobby, corrupt elites, the media that want to make easy money, moral relativism, possibly atheism, etc...

Thanks to this strategy, Jewish/illuminated leaders will succeed in convincing part of the population that there is an attempt by our elites to establish a Satanic world, while the majority of the population will continue to believe that there is nothing of this kind and that all these are the deliriums of conspirationists.

Anyway, if there are all these satanic/illuminati elements in all current cultural production, it is because it is done on purpose so that people can learn about it.

On the side of the anti-illuminati conspiracy camp, the explanation for the presence of all these "evidences" of the Satanist plot is that the Satanists are now so sure of their power that they are no longer afraid to reveal themselves in the open.

That's what I thought at first, when I discovered all this. But once you realize the scam of the 3rd World War plan, it becomes clear that this is not the real reason.

Moreover, the way things have been going in the last few centuries does not go in that direction. Jewish/illuminated leaders were already all-powerful 3 centuries ago. So there was nothing stopping them from doing that before. If they are really Satan worshipers and wanted to convert the population to Satanism from the beginning, they should have indoctrinated it in this way a long time ago, for at least 2 or 3 centuries.

But that's not what we can see. There have been advances and setbacks in the liberation of the mores over the past 300 years. We had the century of Enlightenment very liberal and very anticlerical. Then, the 19th century was much more rigorous. The end of the 19th century was quite anticlerical in France. But it was one of the only countries to have this policy. Why do you do that, if the goal was to have increasingly perverted populations? Why not take advantage of the advances of the 18th century to go even further in the 19th century? Why not establish anticlericalism in other European countries at the end of the 19th century? Thus, they could have achieved their goal 100 years ago.

Then there was the interwar period (1918-1939), when mores were somewhat dissolute. But this was only true in the big cities of some countries (the "Roaring Twenties" in France, the "Golden Twenties" in England, the "Goldene Zwanziger" in Germany or the "Roaring Twenties" in the USA). And in the United States, it was still the era of prohibition (1919-1933). It makes no sense to impose prohibition in a country as big and influential as the United States if the goal is to pervert the world. Then, in all Western countries, it became (or remained, depending on the country) quite serious again in the years going from 45 to 65, despite the arrival of rock music. In the USSR, life was totally sinister. So, here again, it slowed down the establishment of global perversion and Satanist society. It is only since about 68 that mores have really degenerated (and only since the 1990s in the countries of the former USSR). Satan's worshippers apparently do not seem in much of a hurry to establish the reign of their god.

So, all these advances and setbacks concerning mores go in the direction of the idea that the real goal was not to establish a Satanist society, but to manipulate one of the two camps for the objective of the 3rd World War. And once it is over, the elite will drop this story of Satanist society, just as they dropped communism once it has no longer been useful. Who still believes that the whole earth will one day be under communist control? No one. It's now a thing of the past, a dinosaur thing. So much so that the younger generations barely know what it is all about. Well, it will be the same for Satanism once it is no longer useful for the elite.

The ban on foreigners to buy real estate in New Zealand, and the closing of the frontiers of several South American countries, the beginning of a general trend?

I saw a news story a few days ago saying that foreigners could no longer buy real estate in New Zealand.

We can think that this is just the beginning of the movement. Indeed, when the war in Europe and eventually in America begins to become a little too obvious, many people will be tempted to flee to foreign countries that will be far from the future conflict: countries like New Zealand, Australia, South America, China, etc....

Of course, the Jewish/illuminatis leaders have anticipated that. So long before people start to understand what is happening, they will close the borders of these countries and prohibit foreigners from owning real estate there. So Europeans and Americans will be forced to stay in their countries and wage or suffer war.

In short, they will close the trap as they did in 1939 for Jews (see my blog on the Second World War).

Nationalist parties, why a rise in power as early as the 80s?

Many European nationalist parties were launched in the late 1990s or even the early 2000s. And their rise in power has been essentially from the 2000s. This is the case in Finland with the Finns Party (from 1999), in Greece (Golden Dawn, Popular Orthodox Rally), in Hungary (Jobbik), in Norway (Progress Party), in the Netherlands (Party for Freedom), in Sweden (Sweden Democrats), etc.... So, it corresponds roughly to the agenda described in the previous article (necessity to have nationalist parties in the late 90s and early 2000s, especially on the Internet, to counter anti-illuminatis).

But there are two nationalist parties which have become important in European countries since the 1980s, this is the case of the National Front (NF) in France and the FPO in Austria (with a score of 9.7% since 1986).

It is true that there was also the Italian Social Movement. But it was stagnating at around 5% or 6%, and those scores were down from the 1970s. Similarly, there was the Vlaams Block in Belgium, which had already existed since 1978. But, at first, it was more of a separatist party than an anti-immigrant party. And he scored fairly low until the 1988 Antwerp elections when he scored 17.7%. But it was only in one town. And it didn't result in such high scores in the general election. So, in the 1980s, the only two real nationalist parties, with significant and increasing scores were the FN and the FPO.

That said, the FPO was a little behind the National Front, because it was more a populist party than a far-right party as heretical as the National Front. So his positioning was less extreme. Moreover, even if it belonged to an ideologically emblematic country (Austria, the homeland from which Hitler came), it was of much less geopolitical importance. So it had an impact, but clearly less than that of the NF.

So, in reality, it was mainly the National Front that, in the 1980s, was the great far-right party in Europe.

Once again, one can wonder why the masters of the world made these parties become important so early, when they could have made them emerge towards the end of the 90s, like the others.

In my opinion, there are several reasons.

First, it was used as a deterrent. It was important to continue to impose immigration hysterically, making it a moral problem, almost religious, therefore, a choice that is not debatable. Since Jean-Marie le Pen, the leader of the National Front, was presented as Hitler's spiritual son, who was considered then almost as the devil, to fight against the Pen was to fight against the devil, against the threat of a society with values totally contrary to those in place then, a little hell on earth, therefore clearly a religious type of fight. Moreover, French nationalists regularly complained about the "reductio ad Hitlerum", of the demonization to which they were subjected.

And it ensured that people didn't think clearly. If the debate had been dispassionate, people would have been able to say to themselves that it was not normal to bring so many immigrants without training, without money and without speaking the language, which meant that most were unemployable and this, in countries already suffering mass unemployment. But now, with the NF's rejection, people were only thinking with their guts, with their emotions. And as a result, the masters of the world could impose this immigration in European countries easily.