French version in pdf.
English version in pdf.
As we saw in the previous article on the creation of the Jews, since there were in reality no Jews before approximately 1700, the elite could not possibly reveal that the Jewish birth rate was very high between 1700 and 1900. Otherwise, given their small numbers, people would only have to do the math to realize that there could not have been any Jews prior to the 18th century.
For humanity, the situation is somewhat different. The elite effectively accepts the idea that the birth rate was quite high. However, given current population figures, and without some demographic limiting factor, one would inevitably conclude that human beings could not have existed before the 13th or 14th century. Consequently, the elite had to introduce limiting factors.
There is, of course, the explanation regarding a lack of food. Population growth was supposedly limited by recurring famines. But that is not convincing. Once agriculture was discovered, humanity had access to enough food to multiply rapidly. And very quickly, humans learned how to preserve food for long periods. So, the stories about famines are false. It is possible that, in a given region, there might have been a food shortage on a few rare occasions. But overall, food was not an issue. We were like animals with access to tons of food and no predators to kill us. That was bound to lead to rapid population growth.
Since the lack-of-food explanation was not convincing enough, another argument was needed. So, the elite fostered the idea that people were dying in droves from microbial diseases-especially at birth or during childhood, as this explained why they did not live long enough to reproduce. This made the idea of humanity's long history credible: the population grew slowly because, despite high birth rates, many people died from microbial diseases.
And suddenly, one realizes that these diseases are absolutely essential to the official narrative. Without the history of microbial diseases, people would realize that humanity must have emerged only around the 13th or 14th century. This is the only obstacle preventing the realization that humanity is far less ancient than official history claims.
As long as people had little education-and, more importantly, as long as the official narrative was that of the Church, which allotted humanity a mere 6,000 years and spoke of great catastrophes like the Flood wiping out part of the human race-this issue barely existed. However, the shift to the modern narrative (the theory of evolution)-which asserts that humanity as a species has existed for hundreds of thousands of years-created a problem. Hence the concurrent invention of the theory of microbial diseases to explain why the human population grew so slowly.
Consequently, one might assume that to uphold the official historical narrative, the elite would do whatever it takes to preserve the theory of microbial disease.
And indeed, up until 2020, the elite did everything in their power to render invisible any attempt to challenge the concept of contagious disease. I know this because I began doing just that around 2003. Each year, I monitored whether others shared this theory and whether my writings were gaining recognition. I observed that the elite were highly effective at keeping me invisible; there are very few links to my blog from Google or other search engines-even when adding the site's name-and absolutely none without it. As a result, finding the site is extremely difficult.
And for years, practically no one else championed this idea, apart from Stefan Lanka. Two or three times a year, I would search on Google or other search engines using keywords like "viruses don't exist," "viruses are a scam," and so on, in both French and English. Before 2020, I came across perhaps only three or four people advocating this view, but in a negligible way-writing the equivalent of just a page or two of text on the subject, and that was it. Nothing substantial or in-depth. And then, they would disappear from view. I also visited the most conspiracy-oriented websites and forums, yet found nothing of interest.
It is possible, of course, that such people existed but went unnoticed by me because the elite rendered them just as invisible as it did me. Still, I feel that over the course of fifteen years, I would have eventually stumbled upon at least two or three like-minded individuals. Yet, even if there were a few such people who were simply impossible to find, the conclusion remains the same: the elite successfully ensured that this type of idea stayed unknown.
Perhaps I was little known because I wasn't doing it right. That's possible.
However, I did try to defend the idea on a few forums. And forums have an audience-or at least they did back then-so plenty of people could read what I wrote. Yet, even there, I received virtually no positive response. After all, when the elite wants an idea to be adopted, they dispatch numerous agents to post highly enthusiastic comments.
The only other person championing this kind of idea was Stefan Lanka (an agent; see the appendix). From 2001 onwards, he presented ideas similar to mine, albeit in a seemingly far less developed manner (in terms of the volume of published articles and the level of detail analyzed). Given that he was an agent and a well-known figure within the AIDS dissident community, one might have expected the elite to publicize this aspect of his work as well. Yet, that did not happen. This clearly demonstrates that the elite did not want this idea to spread prior to 2020. They only began to truly highlight it from 2014 onwards, and solely in relation to the measles virus. And his fame remained limited to a still fairly small circle of people. So, why did the elite have operative Lanka develop these ideas as early as 2001, only for them to remain obscure for nearly two decades? They could easily have simply had him develop the theory much later. I think it was to have a pioneer to present later. The goal was to prevent these ideas from spreading for twenty years while ensuring there was a famous precursor to present subsequently within the "no-virus" movement of 2020.
In short, it was really from 2020 onwards that the "no-virus" movement exploded. Until 2020, the elite did everything in their power to ensure that the notion of microbial diseases being a complete fabrication never even crossed the minds of the general public-or even those deeply immersed in conspiracy theories. Everything made sense.
