This text is a chapter from my previous article. However, given that it is a fairly important element of the future World War III, I thought it was necessary to highlight it more in a dedicated article.
With the dismantling of the USSR in December 1991, Russia's population declined sharply. If it regains some territory, its population could rise from 145 million to perhaps 170 million. And of course, it will regain some industries, arable land, and mines.
But that won't make much difference compared to Europe. Germany currently has 83 million inhabitants, France 68 million, Italy 59 million, Spain 50 million, Poland 38 million, the Netherlands 18 million, Belgium almost 12 million, the Czech Republic 10 million, Hungary 10 million, Sweden 10 million, Portugal 10 million, Austria 9 million, Denmark 6 million, Norway 5 million, Finland 5 million, and Ireland 5 million. That already adds up to 398 million. And several Balkan countries may also participate in the war alongside the European countries already mentioned.
Not to mention that Turkey might join other Muslim countries in Europe to attack Russia from the south. And Turkey has 85 million inhabitants. Finally, perhaps some Maghreb countries will send fighters to the Russian front in solidarity.
Now, probably not all of these countries will fight against Russia. Perhaps Portugal won't participate in the war, along with a few others. But there should still be a significant numerical superiority on the European side. So, even with an additional 25 million people, the Russians will be far outnumbered by Europe.
This leads me to believe that the shortage of soldiers will likely be filled by China. First, the excellent relations between Russia and China are likely to last until the start of World War III. So, China will probably initially provide economic assistance to Russia, but will be reluctant to do so militarily. Then, we can assume that Europe will declare war on China, for one reason or another. China will then decide to intervene militarily alongside Russia. It will send several million soldiers to fight on the Russian front, which will shift the balance of power and allow Russia to win the war. We already had a taste of this with the arrival of North Korean soldiers in the Ukrainian conflict.
We can therefore understand why the elite has been escalating tensions between the West and China for some time now. Until now, I thought that a potential conflict between the West and China would only serve as a prelude to the elite's plan to invade the East, which I discussed in another paper. However, it appears that China could play a crucial role in the European war.
And this also explains why the elite has transformed China into an industrial giant. A high-performing China is necessary to support Russia, both militarily and economically.
And since the elite like to exploit situations in phase N to fuel conflicts in phase N+1, it's possible that China's aid won't be free and that it will subsequently seize Russian territories in Siberia, or even Kazakhstan, leading to a reversal of alliances after the end of World War III.
To justify Chinese military intervention in Russia, it would have to feel severely threatened. Why would China send millions of soldiers to Russia if there were no threat? Indeed, even if Europe were to declare war on China, if it doesn't pose a direct threat, it would be strange for China to send millions of soldiers to Russia. At best, if there were a nearby threat, it would wage a regional war. But, given Europe's very limited resources in Asia, the threat would likely be negligible. This would therefore be far too insufficient to motivate China to go to war in Russia.
It is therefore conceivable that India, perhaps allied with Bangladesh, will go to war against China. It is the only regional power capable of truly threatening China. All the other states in the region are too weak economically and in terms of population.
This is why the elite ensured India's rapid economic growth, transforming it from a developing country to a modern nation in approximately 15-20 years. A powerful India is necessary to emerge as a credible adversary of China in World War III.
And it's almost certain that various Muslim states will come to India's aid. This should be the case for those west of China. Thus, Kazakhstan, which is Muslim, will attack either China, Russia, or both. Obviously, Kazakhstan only has 20 million inhabitants and a negligible military force compared to China. But Kazakhstan will certainly be helped by other regional Muslim states. This will most likely be the case for Pakistan, since it will add 251 million inhabitants (this figure is certainly false, but the important thing here is the official narrative), and for Afghanistan, since it will add 42 million inhabitants. That would already make 313 million inhabitants. And perhaps Kyrgyzstan (10 million inhabitants) and Tajikistan (10 million) will join the other three, which would make 333 million inhabitants. And since China will be very busy fighting against India, this alliance of Muslim countries will represent a real threat.
One problem is that India is increasingly hostile to Islam. But it's possible that Muslim countries could attack China without being allies of India; or that there might be an alliance of convenience.
All of this helps to understand the Uyghur problem. If the elite orchestrated the repression of the Uyghurs and also amplified this issue through the media, it was to justify the growing hostility of Muslim countries in the region towards China. For now, these states are living in harmony with China. But, as we get closer to World War III, this harmony will crumble. Of course, the elite will also present the attack by Muslim states as political opportunism. In other words, China will be weakened by the conflict with India. Consequently, Muslim states will take advantage of this to seize Chinese territory. However, the Uyghur problem will be one of the justifications used.
China's likely reasoning regarding the Russo-European conflict is that if Russia falls, it will find itself with a Muslim enemy to the north of its territory, in addition to its enemies to the south and west. This would be a potentially deadly threat. Therefore, it will be absolutely crucial for its security that it send troops to aid Russia in Europe to prevent this threat from becoming a reality.
One might argue that this invalidates the need for a war between China and India. The threat of a Muslim Russia would already be sufficient for it to intervene against Europe. However, I still think that the elite will ensure that China goes to war against India and other countries to further justify this intervention. Moreover, the fact that China is at war with India will justify why it intervenes massively alongside Russia only towards the end of World War III. Without this, it would normally have to intervene from the outset, thus heavily tipping the balance in Russia's favor. Indeed, the threat of a Muslim Russia will be present immediately. Therefore, this should push China to intervene right away. But if it is busy elsewhere, this provides an excuse for its inaction.
Of course, the BRICS association will shatter at that point, or even before. Or at the very least, it will be significantly reshaped.
It's also reasonable to assume that Indonesia, being a Muslim country, will intervene against China. Now, the Southeast Asian countries, or at least some of them, are likely to side with China. And since they are close to Indonesia, it's reasonable to assume they will fight mainly against it, aided by China. They might also fight against Bangladesh.
Australia and the Philippines are expected to side with China against Indonesia. It remains to be seen which side Malaysia will take. But, a priori, it should be with Indonesia. In my document on "the history of Southeast Asia," I thought the movements in Papua wouldn't begin until around 2120. But it seems they will start much earlier, as early as the beginning of the 2050s.
Since the US will also enter the war against Muslim Europe, one might think that they, and not China, will be the ones fighting alongside Russia. After all, the US has 340 million inhabitants. Considering that Russia then has, say, 150 million inhabitants, that would still make nearly 500 million. Facing Europe, this would roughly equalize the number of soldiers. And the US is right next to Russia. So, they could easily send troops and equipment.
However, the US will have just emerged from a civil war. Therefore, one can assume that at the beginning of World War III, they won't yet be in a position to fight alongside Russia by sending massive numbers of troops. And it would be difficult for the elite to justify their willingness to do so. We can therefore assume that the configuration will be the same as during the two previous world wars: the USA will intervene in Europe at the end of the war, attacking Western Europe, jointly with England.
As for England, we've seen that there are two or three possible scenarios. What seems fairly certain now is that there will be a civil war before the outbreak of World War III. However, will it be won by the White forces or by the Muslim forces? That's where things are less clear. But we can imagine that England will be liberated before the end of World War III and that, consequently, it could serve as a base for the US (and England) to invade Western Europe.
Therefore, the US will not send military units to Russia, or very few. And since the only other highly populated country allied with Russia will be China, it can only be China that will send troops there.
That said, the US will probably not remain completely inactive before the invasion of Europe. It's likely they will send some troops to Australia to assist it against Indonesia. Hence the US military bases established in Papua New Guinea.
This also means that the US will then be allied with both Russia and China during World War III, all united against Muslim imperialism. Therefore, the current opposition between China and the US will not last, which seems very surprising at present.
And the same will be true between the US and Russia. However, this seems less surprising since Trump's second term, as he has been significantly less hostile towards Russia than his Democratic predecessors.
In fact, the US will be more or less in the same situation as China. If Russia falls to the Islamist camp, the US would then have a powerful Muslim enemy on its doorstep. And since, in this scenario, Europe would also have fallen to the Muslim camp, it would be the 150 million Russians, plus the 500 million Europeans-a formidable Muslim force-that could directly threaten the US. Now, Russia is indeed only close to Alaska, which makes an invasion difficult. But still, it would represent a potentially deadly threat to the US. And it would be all the more dangerous because if Russia fell, China could follow more or less quickly. In that case, the US would find itself almost completely isolated as a major non-Muslim power. Therefore, as with China, it will be crucial for the US that Russia does not fall. It is thus logical that the three countries are allied during World War III. But since the USA will probably still be too weak to support 2 fronts, they should invade Europe from the West, as during the 2 previous world wars.
